PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MFUS vs. GQGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

MFUS vs. GQGU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU).

MFUS and GQGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MFUS is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​. It was launched on Aug 31, 2017. GQGU is an actively managed fund by GQG Partners. It was launched on Jul 14, 2025.

Performance

MFUS vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MFUS vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF		3.90%6.13%
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF		9.61%-1.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFUS achieves a 3.90% return, which is significantly lower than GQGU's 9.61% return.

MFUS

1D
0.72%
1M
-3.47%
YTD
3.90%
6M
5.07%
1Y
18.98%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*
—

GQGU

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
9.61%
6M
7.66%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF

GQG US Equity ETF

Often compared with MFUS:
MFUS vs. RWLMFUS vs. SPYMFUS vs. VOOVMFUS vs. FNDXMFUS vs. AVUSMFUS vs. DGRWMFUS vs. VOO
Often compared with GQGU:
GQGU vs. SCHGGQGU vs. QQQMGQGU vs. VUGGQGU vs. ACWIGQGU vs. BBUSGQGU vs. TOPTGQGU vs. BAMG

MFUS vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.

GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF

Return for Risk

MFUS vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
GQGU
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFUS vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MFUSGQGUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

—

—

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.76

—

—

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

—

—

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

—

—

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.15

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MFUS vs. GQGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MFUSGQGUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.25

-0.53

Correlation

The correlation between MFUS and GQGU is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MFUS vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison

MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than GQGU's 0.93% yield.

TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF		1.52%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF		0.93%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MFUS vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and GQGU.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

MFUSGQGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-6.65%

-28.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.22%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-1.96%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-2.20%

-1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

—

—

Volatility

MFUS vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

MFUSGQGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.30%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.84%

9.55%

+6.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.07%

9.55%

+5.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.45%

9.55%

+7.90%