MFUS vs. GARP
MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) and GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - MFUS tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index while GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFUS returned 12.86%/yr vs 20.18%/yr for GARP. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFUS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GARP.
Performance
MFUS vs. GARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFUS achieves a 16.59% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 20.89% return.
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 16.59%
- 6M
- 16.69%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- —
GARP
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 10.27%
- YTD
- 20.89%
- 6M
- 21.22%
- 1Y
- 42.72%
- 3Y*
- 33.55%
- 5Y*
- 20.18%
- 10Y*
- —
MFUS vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.59% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 8.45% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 20.89% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFUS and GARP is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020 | 0.74 |
The correlation between MFUS and GARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
MFUS vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MFUS
GARP
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
MFUS
GARP
Healthcare
MFUS
GARP
Industrials
MFUS
GARP
Financial Services
MFUS
GARP
Consumer Cyclical
MFUS
GARP
Consumer Defensive
MFUS
GARP
-
Energy
MFUS
GARP
Communication Services
MFUS
GARP
Basic Materials
MFUS
GARP
Real Estate
MFUS
GARP
Utilities
MFUS
GARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFUS vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank
MFUS
GARP
MFUS vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFUS | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.40 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | 3.14 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.52 | 12.59 | +5.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFUS | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 2.40 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.92 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.89 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
MFUS vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than GARP's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and GARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFUS | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -31.34% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.39% | -13.69% | +7.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.39% | -23.73% | +8.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.22% | -30.61% | +12.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.06% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -7.36% | +3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 3.40% | -1.85% |
Volatility
MFUS vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) is 2.97%, while iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that MFUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFUS | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 5.06% | -2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | 13.90% | -5.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 17.87% | -7.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 21.96% | -6.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 23.89% | -6.54% |
MFUS vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFUS vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison
MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than GARP's 0.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFUS and GARP have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GARP has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to MFUS (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUS dropped -35.21% vs GARP's -31.34%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 20.18% vs 12.86% for MFUS. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MFUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 20.18% return vs 12.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.25% for GARP.
MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index, while GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MFUS and 0.15% for GARP.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFUS and GARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer