PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFTFX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFTFX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFTFX achieves a 13.07% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, MFTFX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 5.65%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.


MFTFX

1D
0.73%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
13.07%
6M
13.82%
1Y
46.30%
3Y*
2.94%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
5.65%

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFTFX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFTFX
Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund
13.07%9.29%6.87%-13.57%57.88%2.13%-4.13%15.17%-19.70%19.09%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.75%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between MFTFX and VOO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.12

Over the past year, MFTFX and VOO have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFTFX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFTFX
MFTFX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MFTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
MFTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFTFX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFTFXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.36

3.02

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.29

13.58

-1.29

MFTFX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFTFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFTFX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFTFX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFTFX drawdown since its inception was -35.70%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFTFX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFTFXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.70%

-33.99%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-8.90%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.57%

-18.69%

-13.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.57%

-24.52%

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.70%

-33.99%

-1.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-1.74%

-2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.94%

-3.68%

-13.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

1.98%

+1.51%

Volatility

MFTFX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 4.77% and 4.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFTFXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

4.60%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

9.73%

+2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.05%

12.39%

+6.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.96%

16.90%

+5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.14%

18.05%

+4.09%

MFTFX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFTFX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFTFX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

MFTFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFTFX
Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.75%41.04%2.30%0.00%20.00%7.84%2.12%9.36%1.21%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFTFX and VOO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFTFX has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFTFX dropped -35.70% vs VOO's -33.99%.

MFTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFTFX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer