MFTFX vs. KMLM
Compare and contrast key facts about Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM).
MFTFX is managed by Arrow Funds. It was launched on Apr 28, 2010. KMLM is an actively managed fund by CICC. It was launched on Dec 2, 2020.
Performance
MFTFX vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MFTFX vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFTFX Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund | 5.39% | 9.29% | 6.87% | -13.57% | 57.88% | 2.13% | 8.83% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 8.67% | -2.98% | -1.69% | -5.66% | 30.61% | 7.04% | 5.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFTFX achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly lower than KMLM's 8.67% return.
MFTFX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -6.93%
- YTD
- 5.39%
- 6M
- 14.77%
- 1Y
- 21.93%
- 3Y*
- 6.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- 5.15%
KMLM
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 8.67%
- 6M
- 10.01%
- 1Y
- 8.60%
- 3Y*
- 0.44%
- 5Y*
- 5.63%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MFTFX vs. KMLM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFTFX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MFTFX vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank
MFTFX
KMLM
MFTFX vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFTFX | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 0.88 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.16 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 1.13 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.86 | 3.31 | -0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFTFX | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 0.88 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.39 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.49 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between MFTFX and KMLM is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MFTFX vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison
MFTFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFTFX Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.75% | 41.04% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 20.00% | 7.84% | 2.12% | 9.36% | 1.21% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 4.62% | 5.02% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 13.22% | 6.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MFTFX vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFTFX drawdown since its inception was -35.70%, which is greater than KMLM's maximum drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFTFX and KMLM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFTFX | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.70% | -27.47% | -8.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.94% | -6.73% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.57% | -27.47% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.12% | -15.27% | +7.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.15% | -12.73% | -4.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.42% | 2.41% | +4.01% |
Volatility
MFTFX vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison
Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) at 4.05%. This indicates that MFTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MFTFX | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 4.05% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.24% | 7.22% | +8.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.16% | 9.84% | +11.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 14.57% | +7.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 14.67% | +7.46% |