MFTFX vs. KMLM
MFTFX (Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund) and KMLM (KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF) are both Systematic Trend funds. Over the past 5 years, MFTFX returned 11.96%/yr vs 4.70%/yr for KMLM. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFTFX charges 1.54%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for KMLM.
Performance
MFTFX vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFTFX achieves a 13.07% return, which is significantly higher than KMLM's 7.82% return.
MFTFX
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 13.07%
- 6M
- 13.82%
- 1Y
- 46.30%
- 3Y*
- 2.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- 5.65%
KMLM
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- 7.82%
- 6M
- 7.66%
- 1Y
- 15.91%
- 3Y*
- -0.44%
- 5Y*
- 4.70%
- 10Y*
- —
MFTFX vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFTFX Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund | 13.07% | 9.29% | 6.87% | -13.57% | 57.88% | 2.13% | 8.63% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 7.82% | -2.98% | -1.69% | -5.66% | 30.61% | 7.04% | 5.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFTFX and KMLM is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2020 | 0.58 |
The correlation between MFTFX and KMLM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFTFX vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank
MFTFX
KMLM
MFTFX vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFTFX | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.25 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.36 | 1.99 | +2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.29 | 6.87 | +5.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFTFX vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFTFX drawdown since its inception was -35.70%, which is greater than KMLM's maximum drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFTFX and KMLM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFTFX | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.70% | -27.47% | -8.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.83% | -8.04% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.57% | -22.28% | -10.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.57% | -27.47% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.76% | -15.93% | +12.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.94% | -12.75% | -4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 2.32% | +1.17% |
Volatility
MFTFX vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison
Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) at 2.95%. This indicates that MFTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFTFX | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 2.95% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 9.80% | +2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.05% | 11.38% | +7.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 14.58% | +7.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.14% | 14.69% | +7.45% |
MFTFX vs. KMLM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFTFX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFTFX vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison
MFTFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 4.66% | 5.02% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 13.22% | 6.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFTFX Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.75% | 41.04% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 20.00% | 7.84% | 2.12% | 9.36% | 1.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFTFX and KMLM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFTFX has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to KMLM (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFTFX dropped -35.70% vs KMLM's -27.47%.
MFTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFTFX and KMLM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer