PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFSV vs. GCOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MFSV vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MFSV vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MFSV
MFS Active Value ETF
1.12%13.63%-4.64%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
13.21%27.34%-3.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFSV achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 13.21% return.


MFSV

1D
1.79%
1M
-4.46%
YTD
1.12%
6M
3.07%
1Y
10.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GCOW

1D
0.85%
1M
-1.84%
YTD
13.21%
6M
20.65%
1Y
31.30%
3Y*
16.89%
5Y*
13.65%
10Y*
10.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MFSV vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFSV has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MFSV vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFSV
MFSV Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
MFSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFSV Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MFSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFSV Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFSV vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFSVGCOWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

2.27

-1.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.03

3.01

-1.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.44

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

2.77

-1.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.50

14.12

-9.62

MFSV vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFSV Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFSV and GCOW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFSVGCOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

2.27

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.60

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between MFSV and GCOW is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MFSV vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

MFSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than GCOW's 4.39% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MFSV
MFS Active Value ETF
1.56%1.53%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
4.39%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%

Drawdowns

MFSV vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFSV drawdown since its inception was -12.74%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSV and GCOW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MFSVGCOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.74%

-37.64%

+24.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-11.05%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.66%

-1.84%

-2.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-5.90%

+3.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.17%

+0.27%

Volatility

MFSV vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) is 3.72%, while Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that MFSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MFSVGCOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

4.03%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

7.90%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.76%

13.89%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.17%

13.48%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.17%

16.25%

-2.08%