PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFSV vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MFSV vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MFSV vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MFSV
MFS Active Value ETF
1.12%13.63%-4.64%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
14.21%14.79%-4.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFSV achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 14.21% return.


MFSV

1D
1.79%
1M
-4.46%
YTD
1.12%
6M
3.07%
1Y
10.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDL

1D
-1.10%
1M
-1.21%
YTD
14.21%
6M
16.89%
1Y
21.28%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
13.87%
10Y*
11.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MFSV vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFSV has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MFSV vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFSV
MFSV Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
MFSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFSV Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MFSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFSV Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFSV vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFSVFDLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

1.43

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.03

2.00

-0.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.28

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

1.77

-0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.50

7.07

-2.57

MFSV vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFSV Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFSV and FDL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFSVFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

1.43

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.46

+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between MFSV and FDL is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MFSV vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

MFSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than FDL's 3.65% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFSV
MFS Active Value ETF
1.56%1.53%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.65%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%

Drawdowns

MFSV vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFSV drawdown since its inception was -12.74%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSV and FDL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MFSVFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.74%

-65.93%

+53.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-11.58%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.66%

-1.21%

-3.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-9.72%

+7.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.90%

-0.46%

Volatility

MFSV vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.71%. This indicates that MFSV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MFSVFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

2.71%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

8.23%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.76%

14.94%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.17%

14.32%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.17%

17.09%

-2.92%