MFJIX vs. LTSTX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MFJIX (MFS Lifetime 2060 Fund) and LTSTX (Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, MFJIX returned 8.71%/yr vs 5.43%/yr for LTSTX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MFJIX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LTSTX.

Performance

MFJIX vs. LTSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2060 Fund (MFJIX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFJIX achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than LTSTX's 4.65% return.

MFJIX

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 2.47%
• YTD: 9.91%
• 6M: 10.37%
• 1Y: 20.62%
• 3Y*: 16.64%
• 5Y*: 8.71%
• 10Y*: —

LTSTX

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 1.41%
• YTD: 4.65%
• 6M: 4.87%
• 1Y: 12.86%
• 3Y*: 12.14%
• 5Y*: 5.43%
• 10Y*: 8.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFJIX vs. LTSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MFJIX MFS Lifetime 2060 Fund	9.91%	16.16%	13.21%	16.87%	-15.79%	20.41%	13.46%	26.96%	-7.92%	20.67%
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund	4.65%	12.16%	11.91%	13.30%	-15.23%	10.91%	13.70%	20.50%	-6.41%	16.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MFJIX and LTSTX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.95

The correlation between MFJIX and LTSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MFJIX vs. LTSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFJIX

MFJIX Risk / Return Rank: 49
MFJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
MFJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
MFJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
MFJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
MFJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

LTSTX

LTSTX Risk / Return Rank: 50
LTSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
LTSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
LTSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
LTSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
LTSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFJIX vs. LTSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2060 Fund (MFJIX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MFJIX	LTSTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.98	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	2.87	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.38	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	2.52	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.76	11.37	-0.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MFJIX vs. LTSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFJIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the LTSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFJIX and LTSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFJIX	LTSTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	1.98	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.59	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.48	+0.27

Drawdowns

MFJIX vs. LTSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFJIX drawdown since its inception was -32.96%, smaller than the maximum LTSTX drawdown of -48.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFJIX and LTSTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFJIX	LTSTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.96%	-48.17%	+15.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.38%	-5.24%	-3.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.56%	-8.12%	-6.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.20%	-21.01%	-2.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-0.52%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.40%	-6.16%	+1.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	1.16%	+0.79%

Volatility

MFJIX vs. LTSTX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Lifetime 2060 Fund (MFJIX) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) at 2.09%. This indicates that MFJIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFJIX	LTSTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	2.09%	+0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.26%	5.40%	+2.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.52%	6.66%	+3.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.00%	9.18%	+4.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.20%	9.82%	+5.38%

MFJIX vs. LTSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFJIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LTSTX's 0.01% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MFJIX vs. LTSTX - Dividend Comparison

MFJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, less than LTSTX's 11.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund	11.65%	12.19%	9.74%	4.26%	8.00%	7.66%	5.25%	6.91%	6.39%	4.75%	3.65%	8.91%
MFJIX MFS Lifetime 2060 Fund	5.86%	6.44%	4.08%	3.18%	5.33%	6.26%	1.76%	2.77%	2.93%	2.60%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFJIX and LTSTX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, MFJIX and LTSTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MFJIX or LTSTX?

MFJIX has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to LTSTX (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFJIX dropped -32.96% vs LTSTX's -48.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MFJIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.