LTSTX vs. PHTYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX).
LTSTX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Feb 28, 2008. PHTYX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Sep 29, 2014.
Performance
LTSTX vs. PHTYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LTSTX vs. PHTYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund | -2.64% | 12.16% | 11.91% | 13.30% | -15.23% | 10.91% | 13.70% | 20.50% | -6.41% | 16.75% |
PHTYX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund | -4.03% | 18.54% | 16.13% | 19.35% | -18.26% | 18.37% | 15.78% | 24.79% | -9.07% | 19.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTSTX achieves a -2.64% return, which is significantly higher than PHTYX's -4.03% return. Over the past 10 years, LTSTX has underperformed PHTYX with an annualized return of 7.44%, while PHTYX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.95% annualized return.
LTSTX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -2.64%
- 6M
- -1.15%
- 1Y
- 8.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 7.44%
PHTYX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- -4.03%
- 6M
- -1.36%
- 1Y
- 15.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LTSTX vs. PHTYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTSTX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than PHTYX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
LTSTX vs. PHTYX — Risk / Return Rank
LTSTX
PHTYX
LTSTX vs. PHTYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTSTX | PHTYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 1.04 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 1.56 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | 6.22 | -0.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTSTX | PHTYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.04 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.68 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.62 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between LTSTX and PHTYX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LTSTX vs. PHTYX - Dividend Comparison
LTSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.52%, more than PHTYX's 5.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund | 12.52% | 12.19% | 9.74% | 4.26% | 8.00% | 7.66% | 5.25% | 6.91% | 6.39% | 4.75% | 3.65% | 8.91% |
PHTYX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund | 5.14% | 4.94% | 4.41% | 3.05% | 9.68% | 4.72% | 3.45% | 3.63% | 4.66% | 2.24% | 2.00% | 1.66% |
Drawdowns
LTSTX vs. PHTYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTSTX drawdown since its inception was -48.17%, which is greater than PHTYX's maximum drawdown of -30.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTSTX and PHTYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTSTX | PHTYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.17% | -30.61% | -17.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -11.00% | +4.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.01% | -24.94% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.33% | -30.61% | +7.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.15% | -7.95% | +2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -4.63% | -1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.40% | 2.19% | -0.79% |
Volatility
LTSTX vs. PHTYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) is 2.99%, while Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that LTSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHTYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LTSTX | PHTYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 4.60% | -1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.90% | 8.23% | -3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.43% | 14.73% | -6.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.16% | 14.48% | -5.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.81% | 14.75% | -4.94% |