LTSTX vs. FRIMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX).
LTSTX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Feb 28, 2008. FRIMX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 30, 2007.
Performance
LTSTX vs. FRIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LTSTX vs. FRIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund | -2.64% | 12.16% | 11.91% | 13.30% | -15.23% | 10.91% | 13.70% | 20.50% | -6.41% | 16.75% |
FRIMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I | -0.51% | 9.94% | 4.30% | 8.06% | -11.66% | 2.78% | 8.57% | 10.57% | -1.82% | 7.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTSTX achieves a -2.64% return, which is significantly lower than FRIMX's -0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, LTSTX has outperformed FRIMX with an annualized return of 7.44%, while FRIMX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.92% annualized return.
LTSTX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -2.64%
- 6M
- -1.15%
- 1Y
- 8.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 7.44%
FRIMX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- 7.05%
- 3Y*
- 5.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.40%
- 10Y*
- 3.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LTSTX vs. FRIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTSTX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FRIMX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LTSTX vs. FRIMX — Risk / Return Rank
LTSTX
FRIMX
LTSTX vs. FRIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTSTX | FRIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 1.56 | -0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 2.17 | -0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.31 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 2.08 | -0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | 8.41 | -2.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTSTX | FRIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.56 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.46 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.88 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.53 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between LTSTX and FRIMX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LTSTX vs. FRIMX - Dividend Comparison
LTSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.52%, more than FRIMX's 3.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund | 12.52% | 12.19% | 9.74% | 4.26% | 8.00% | 7.66% | 5.25% | 6.91% | 6.39% | 4.75% | 3.65% | 8.91% |
FRIMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I | 3.15% | 3.11% | 3.01% | 2.82% | 4.52% | 3.54% | 2.41% | 2.56% | 4.67% | 8.56% | 1.67% | 1.68% |
Drawdowns
LTSTX vs. FRIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTSTX drawdown since its inception was -48.17%, which is greater than FRIMX's maximum drawdown of -33.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTSTX and FRIMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTSTX | FRIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.17% | -33.73% | -14.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -3.44% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.01% | -16.12% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.33% | -16.12% | -7.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.15% | -3.19% | -1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -3.74% | -2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.40% | 0.85% | +0.55% |
Volatility
LTSTX vs. FRIMX - Volatility Comparison
Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX) at 1.95%. This indicates that LTSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LTSTX | FRIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 1.95% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.90% | 2.86% | +2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.43% | 4.59% | +3.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.16% | 5.21% | +3.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.81% | 4.47% | +5.34% |