MFIG vs. IQM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM).

MFIG and IQM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MFIG is a passively managed fund by Motley Fool that tracks the performance of the Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2025. IQM is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020.

Performance

MFIG vs. IQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MFIG vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF	-10.10%	-0.21%
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	1.18%	-3.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFIG achieves a -10.10% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 1.18% return.

MFIG

• 1D: 3.06%
• 1M: -4.67%
• YTD: -10.10%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IQM

• 1D: 6.12%
• 1M: -5.61%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.33%
• 1Y: 55.72%
• 3Y*: 26.13%
• 5Y*: 14.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFIG vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MFIG and IQM have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

MFIG

Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF

IQM

Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF

Return for Risk

MFIG vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQM

IQM Risk / Return Rank: 88
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFIG vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFIG	IQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.74	0.77	-2.51

Correlation

The correlation between MFIG and IQM is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MFIG vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison

Neither MFIG nor IQM has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	0.01%

Drawdowns

MFIG vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFIG drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum IQM drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIG and IQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFIG	IQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.29%	-44.91%	+30.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.61%	-8.68%	-2.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.10%	-12.55%	+7.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.70%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MFIG	IQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.90%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	23.48%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.50%	33.37%	-15.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.50%	28.67%	-11.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.50%	30.73%	-13.23%