PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFIG vs. FTCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFIG vs. FTCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFIG achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly higher than FTCS's 0.01% return.


MFIG

1D
-1.31%
1M
6.47%
YTD
4.31%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTCS

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
0.01%
6M
0.21%
1Y
2.29%
3Y*
9.49%
5Y*
5.40%
10Y*
10.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFIG vs. FTCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MFIG and FTCS is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFIG vs. FTCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFIG

FTCS
FTCS Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FTCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCS Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFIG vs. FTCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MFIG vs. FTCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFIGFTCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.50

+0.03

Drawdowns

MFIG vs. FTCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFIG drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum FTCS drawdown of -53.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIG and FTCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFIGFTCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.29%

-53.64%

+39.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.15%

-6.95%

+4.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-6.92%

+2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

Volatility

MFIG vs. FTCS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFIGFTCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.58%

9.82%

+6.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.58%

13.13%

+3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

15.54%

+1.04%

MFIG vs. FTCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFIG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FTCS's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFIG vs. FTCS - Dividend Comparison

MFIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
1.12%1.04%1.33%1.47%1.23%1.06%0.93%1.26%1.26%1.15%1.43%1.50%
MFIG
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFIG and FTCS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MFIG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MFIG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for FTCS.

FTCS has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for MFIG.

MFIG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FTCS is Large Cap Blend Equities. MFIG tracks Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index, while FTCS tracks The Capital Strength Index. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFIG and 0.53% for FTCS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFIG and FTCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer