MFIG vs. FTCS
MFIG (Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF) and FTCS (First Trust Capital Strength ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFIG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index, while FTCS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the The Capital Strength Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MFIG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for FTCS.
Performance
MFIG vs. FTCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFIG achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly higher than FTCS's 0.01% return.
MFIG
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 6.47%
- YTD
- 4.31%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTCS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 2.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
MFIG vs. FTCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | 4.31% | -0.21% |
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 0.01% | 1.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFIG and FTCS is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFIG vs. FTCS — Risk / Return Rank
MFIG
FTCS
MFIG vs. FTCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFIG | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.50 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
MFIG vs. FTCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFIG drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum FTCS drawdown of -53.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIG and FTCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFIG | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -53.64% | +39.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -6.95% | +4.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -6.92% | +2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.14% | — |
Volatility
MFIG vs. FTCS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFIG | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.58% | 9.82% | +6.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 13.13% | +3.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 15.54% | +1.04% |
MFIG vs. FTCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFIG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FTCS's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFIG vs. FTCS - Dividend Comparison
MFIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 1.12% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.47% | 1.23% | 1.06% | 0.93% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.15% | 1.43% | 1.50% |
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFIG and FTCS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFIG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFIG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for FTCS.
FTCS has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for MFIG.
MFIG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FTCS is Large Cap Blend Equities. MFIG tracks Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index, while FTCS tracks The Capital Strength Index. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFIG and 0.53% for FTCS.
Find the right allocation for MFIG and FTCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer