MFG vs. WM
MFG (Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.) and WM (Waste Management, Inc.) are both stocks. MFG operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while WM operates in Waste Management (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, MFG returned 15.72%/yr vs 15.36%/yr for WM. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MFG vs. WM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFG achieves a 32.24% return, which is significantly higher than WM's 0.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MFG having a 15.72% annualized return and WM not far behind at 15.36%.
MFG
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- 11.39%
- YTD
- 32.24%
- 6M
- 31.34%
- 1Y
- 78.46%
- 3Y*
- 51.80%
- 5Y*
- 30.84%
- 10Y*
- 15.72%
WM
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 2.63%
- 1Y
- -5.72%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.14%
- 10Y*
- 15.36%
MFG vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 32.24% | 54.60% | 47.85% | 26.14% | 17.09% | 2.40% | -15.06% | 3.00% | -17.58% | 3.21% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 0.71% | 10.50% | 14.28% | 16.20% | -4.49% | 43.82% | 5.46% | 30.45% | 5.32% | 24.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFG and WM is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2006 | 0.24 |
The correlation between MFG and WM shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MFG:
$118.10B
WM:
$88.75B
MFG:
¥101.00
WM:
$6.91
MFG:
15.35
WM:
31.76
MFG:
0.56
WM:
2.60
MFG:
2.22
WM:
3.49
MFG:
1.66
WM:
8.86
MFG:
¥8.66T
WM:
$25.41B
MFG:
¥4.12T
WM:
$5.61B
MFG:
¥1.63T
WM:
$6.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFG vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank
MFG
WM
MFG vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFG | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 0.96 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | -0.36 | +3.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | -0.79 | +9.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFG vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFG drawdown since its inception was -80.57%, roughly equal to the maximum WM drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFG and WM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFG | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.57% | -77.85% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.78% | -16.70% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.33% | -18.14% | -10.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.33% | -18.14% | -10.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.87% | -30.07% | -19.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.06% | -10.24% | +6.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.82% | -17.69% | -43.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.31% | 7.58% | +1.73% |
Volatility
MFG vs. WM - Volatility Comparison
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) has a higher volatility of 10.09% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 6.13%. This indicates that MFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFG | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.09% | 6.13% | +3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.20% | 14.08% | +10.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.69% | 19.03% | +11.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.66% | 18.62% | +11.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.49% | 19.54% | +6.95% |
Dividends
MFG vs. WM - Dividend Comparison
MFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than WM's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 0.96% | 2.68% | 3.20% | 3.73% | 4.34% | 2.76% | 2.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.86% | 3.77% | 3.10% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 1.61% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 1.38% | 1.85% | 1.80% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 2.31% | 2.89% |
Financials
MFG vs. WM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. and Waste Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MFG vs. WM - Profitability Comparison
MFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.17T and revenue of 2.27T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.7%.
WM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 304.56B and revenue of 2.27T, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.
WM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.11B and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.
MFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 232.94B and revenue of 2.27T, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
WM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a net income of 723.00M and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MFG and WM have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFG has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to WM (6.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFG dropped -80.57% vs WM's -77.85%.
MFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFG and WM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer