MFEGX vs. SCHG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).

MFEGX is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000® Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 29, 1986. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both MFEGX and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

MFEGX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MFEGX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MFEGX MFS Growth Fund Class A	-13.67%	12.06%	51.46%	35.81%	-31.31%	23.28%	36.29%	37.35%	2.04%	30.52%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	-10.59%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFEGX achieves a -13.67% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's -10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, MFEGX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 15.75%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.83% annualized return.

MFEGX

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -9.08%
• YTD: -13.67%
• 6M: -14.32%
• 1Y: 6.27%
• 3Y*: 21.61%
• 5Y*: 10.93%
• 10Y*: 15.75%

SCHG

• 1D: 3.67%
• 1M: -5.12%
• YTD: -10.59%
• 6M: -8.51%
• 1Y: 16.81%
• 3Y*: 21.91%
• 5Y*: 12.55%
• 10Y*: 16.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFEGX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFEGX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

MFEGX

MFS Growth Fund Class A

SCHG

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

Return for Risk

MFEGX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFEGX

MFEGX Risk / Return Rank: 11
MFEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
MFEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
MFEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
MFEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MFEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 46
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFEGX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MFEGX	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	0.75	-0.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.57	1.23	-0.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.17	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	1.03	-0.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.68	3.54	-2.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MFEGX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFEGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFEGX and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFEGX	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29	0.75	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.57	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	0.79	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.79	-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between MFEGX and SCHG is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MFEGX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

MFEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.55%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MFEGX MFS Growth Fund Class A	19.55%	16.88%	28.04%	5.30%	1.14%	2.98%	7.45%	1.68%	3.96%	2.65%	1.68%	3.84%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.43%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Drawdowns

MFEGX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFEGX drawdown since its inception was -72.42%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEGX and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFEGX	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.42%	-34.59%	-37.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.39%	-16.41%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.27%	-34.59%	-1.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.27%	-34.59%	-1.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.39%	-13.34%	-4.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.32%	-5.22%	-17.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.09%	4.78%	+0.31%

Volatility

MFEGX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) is 5.57%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that MFEGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFEGX	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.57%	6.67%	-1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.05%	12.51%	-0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.57%	22.43%	-0.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.08%	22.32%	-0.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.27%	21.51%	-0.24%