PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFEGX vs. VOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFEGX vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFEGX achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly lower than VOOG's 14.85% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MFEGX having a 18.02% annualized return and VOOG not far ahead at 18.26%.


MFEGX

1D
1.14%
1M
4.89%
YTD
6.54%
6M
5.68%
1Y
18.28%
3Y*
27.05%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
18.02%

VOOG

1D
-0.15%
1M
8.31%
YTD
14.85%
6M
14.86%
1Y
36.07%
3Y*
28.53%
5Y*
16.56%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFEGX vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFEGX
MFS Growth Fund Class A
6.54%12.06%51.46%35.81%-31.31%23.28%36.29%37.35%2.04%30.52%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
14.85%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between MFEGX and VOOG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.96

The correlation between MFEGX and VOOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFEGX vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFEGX
MFEGX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MFEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFEGX vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFEGXVOOGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

2.29

-1.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

3.07

-1.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.39

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

2.72

-1.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.59

11.28

-7.70

MFEGX vs. VOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFEGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the VOOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFEGX and VOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFEGXVOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

2.29

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.79

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.88

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.91

-0.42

Drawdowns

MFEGX vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFEGX drawdown since its inception was -72.42%, which is greater than VOOG's maximum drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEGX and VOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFEGXVOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.42%

-32.73%

-39.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.39%

-13.71%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.28%

-22.18%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.27%

-32.73%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

-32.73%

-3.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.15%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.23%

-4.97%

-17.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.36%

3.31%

+2.05%

Volatility

MFEGX vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) is 3.55%, while Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that MFEGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFEGXVOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

4.14%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.25%

12.39%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

15.83%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.11%

21.19%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.35%

20.73%

+0.62%

MFEGX vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFEGX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOG's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFEGX vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison

MFEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.84%, more than VOOG's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFEGX
MFS Growth Fund Class A
15.84%16.88%28.04%5.30%1.14%2.98%7.45%1.68%3.96%2.65%1.68%3.84%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.43%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, MFEGX and VOOG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOOG has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to MFEGX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFEGX dropped -72.42% vs VOOG's -32.73%.

VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFEGX and VOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer