MFC.TO vs. ENB.TO
MFC.TO (Manulife Financial Corporation) and ENB.TO (Enbridge Inc.) are both stocks. MFC.TO operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services), while ENB.TO operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, MFC.TO returned 17.33%/yr vs 10.59%/yr for ENB.TO. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MFC.TO vs. ENB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFC.TO achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly lower than ENB.TO's 23.42% return. Over the past 10 years, MFC.TO has outperformed ENB.TO with an annualized return of 17.33%, while ENB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.59% annualized return.
MFC.TO
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 9.90%
- YTD
- 15.19%
- 6M
- 17.52%
- 1Y
- 38.24%
- 3Y*
- 35.54%
- 5Y*
- 23.66%
- 10Y*
- 17.33%
ENB.TO
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- 23.42%
- 6M
- 23.83%
- 1Y
- 31.58%
- 3Y*
- 24.19%
- 5Y*
- 17.63%
- 10Y*
- 10.59%
MFC.TO vs. ENB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFC.TO Manulife Financial Corporation | 15.19% | 17.45% | 57.53% | 28.33% | 5.83% | 11.57% | -9.19% | 41.99% | -23.25% | 13.30% |
ENB.TO Enbridge Inc. | 23.42% | 14.09% | 37.18% | -3.28% | 13.96% | 29.98% | -15.30% | 29.43% | -8.30% | -8.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFC.TO and ENB.TO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.33 |
The correlation between MFC.TO and ENB.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MFC.TO:
CA$94.62B
ENB.TO:
CA$172.81B
MFC.TO:
CA$3.78
ENB.TO:
CA$3.46
MFC.TO:
14.89
ENB.TO:
22.84
MFC.TO:
5.22
ENB.TO:
1.05
MFC.TO:
1.78
ENB.TO:
2.22
MFC.TO:
2.15
ENB.TO:
2.13
MFC.TO:
CA$53.61B
ENB.TO:
CA$77.79B
MFC.TO:
CA$27.15B
ENB.TO:
CA$25.33B
MFC.TO:
CA$8.25B
ENB.TO:
CA$20.88B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFC.TO vs. ENB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MFC.TO
ENB.TO
MFC.TO vs. ENB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFC.TO | ENB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 3.30 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.65 | 8.61 | +0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFC.TO vs. ENB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFC.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.97%, which is greater than ENB.TO's maximum drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFC.TO and ENB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFC.TO | ENB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.97% | -39.47% | -38.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.71% | -9.42% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.63% | -11.56% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.05% | -21.38% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.68% | -39.47% | -13.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.51% | +1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.15% | -8.34% | -19.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 3.66% | +0.30% |
Volatility
MFC.TO vs. ENB.TO - Volatility Comparison
Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to Enbridge Inc. (ENB.TO) at 5.97%. This indicates that MFC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFC.TO | ENB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.81% | 5.97% | +1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.42% | 12.62% | +2.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.91% | 15.64% | +4.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.55% | 15.69% | +5.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.09% | 22.43% | +3.66% |
Dividends
MFC.TO vs. ENB.TO - Dividend Comparison
MFC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than ENB.TO's 4.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENB.TO Enbridge Inc. | 4.84% | 5.74% | 6.00% | 7.44% | 6.50% | 6.76% | 7.96% | 5.72% | 6.33% | 4.91% | 3.75% | 4.04% |
MFC.TO Manulife Financial Corporation | 3.28% | 3.53% | 3.62% | 4.99% | 5.47% | 4.85% | 4.94% | 3.79% | 4.70% | 3.13% | 3.09% | 2.39% |
Financials
MFC.TO vs. ENB.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Manulife Financial Corporation and Enbridge Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MFC.TO vs. ENB.TO - Profitability Comparison
MFC.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 12.28B and revenue of 12.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
ENB.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enbridge Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.60B and revenue of 31.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.
MFC.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.47B and revenue of 12.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
ENB.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enbridge Inc. reported an operating income of 5.06B and revenue of 31.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
MFC.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.19B and revenue of 12.28B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.
ENB.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enbridge Inc. reported a net income of 2.44B and revenue of 31.19B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MFC.TO and ENB.TO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MFC.TO and ENB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer