MFC.TO vs. SLF.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO) and Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MFC.TO or SLF.TO.
Key characteristics
| MFC.TO | SLF.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.53% | 3.93% |
| 1Y Return | 26.50% | 11.83% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.57% | 6.57% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.75% | 9.47% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.24% | 10.97% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.59 | 1.00 |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.28% | 13.22% |
| Max Drawdown | -99.98% | -71.53% |
| Current Drawdown | -99.83% | -5.17% |
Fundamentals
| MFC.TO | SLF.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$57.28B | CA$40.95B |
| EPS | CA$2.61 | CA$5.26 |
| PE Ratio | 12.15 | 13.37 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.03 | 1.17 |
| Revenue (TTM) | CA$27.25B | CA$30.85B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$17.65B | CA$14.48B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$8.36B | CA$4.64B |
Correlation
The correlation between MFC.TO and SLF.TO is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
MFC.TO vs. SLF.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MFC.TO achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly higher than SLF.TO's 3.93% return. Over the past 10 years, MFC.TO has underperformed SLF.TO with an annualized return of 8.24%, while SLF.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.97% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MFC.TO vs. SLF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO) and Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MFC.TO vs. SLF.TO - Dividend Comparison
MFC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than SLF.TO's 4.33% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFC.TO Manulife Financial Corporation | 3.43% | 3.67% | 4.21% | 3.88% | 3.69% | 2.86% | 3.64% | 2.60% | 2.36% | 2.46% | 3.12% | 2.39% |
SLF.TO Sun Life Financial Inc. | 4.33% | 4.37% | 4.39% | 3.28% | 3.89% | 3.55% | 4.21% | 3.36% | 3.14% | 3.50% | 3.44% | 3.84% |
Drawdowns
MFC.TO vs. SLF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFC.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than SLF.TO's maximum drawdown of -71.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFC.TO and SLF.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MFC.TO vs. SLF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF.TO) at 3.63%. This indicates that MFC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MFC.TO vs. SLF.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Manulife Financial Corporation and Sun Life Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities