ENB.TO vs. SU.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Enbridge Inc. (ENB.TO) and Suncor Energy Inc. (SU.TO).

Performance

ENB.TO vs. SU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Enbridge Inc. (ENB.TO) and Suncor Energy Inc. (SU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ENB.TO vs. SU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ENB.TO Enbridge Inc.	16.35%	14.10%	37.18%	-3.27%	13.96%	29.98%	-15.30%	29.43%	-8.30%	-8.84%
SU.TO Suncor Energy Inc.	52.63%	25.96%	28.16%	5.52%	43.46%	55.51%	-46.99%	17.82%	-14.02%	9.43%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ENB.TO : CA$165.39B SU.TO : CA$110.50B
EPS ENB.TO : CA$3.42 SU.TO : CA$4.88
PE Ratio ENB.TO : 22.03 SU.TO : 18.86
PEG Ratio ENB.TO : 1.01 SU.TO : 0.68
PS Ratio ENB.TO : 2.53 SU.TO : 2.28
PB Ratio ENB.TO : 2.98 SU.TO : 2.45
Total Revenue (TTM) ENB.TO : CA$65.16B SU.TO : CA$48.91B
Gross Profit (TTM) ENB.TO : CA$22.86B SU.TO : CA$21.24B
EBITDA (TTM) ENB.TO : CA$19.72B SU.TO : CA$16.18B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENB.TO achieves a 16.35% return, which is significantly lower than SU.TO's 52.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ENB.TO has underperformed SU.TO with an annualized return of 10.93%, while SU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.66% annualized return.

ENB.TO

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 4.06%
• YTD: 16.35%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 25.32%
• 3Y*: 21.18%
• 5Y*: 17.67%
• 10Y*: 10.93%

SU.TO

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 20.68%
• YTD: 52.63%
• 6M: 61.86%
• 1Y: 74.27%
• 3Y*: 37.88%
• 5Y*: 35.31%
• 10Y*: 15.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ENB.TO vs. SU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENB.TO

ENB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 83
ENB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
ENB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
ENB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
ENB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ENB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 82

SU.TO

SU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 93
SU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
SU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 95
SU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
SU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENB.TO vs. SU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enbridge Inc. (ENB.TO) and Suncor Energy Inc. (SU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ENB.TO	SU.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	2.79	-1.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	3.22	-1.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.50	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	3.87	-1.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.54	11.86	-5.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ENB.TO vs. SU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the SU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENB.TO and SU.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENB.TO	SU.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.60	2.79	-1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.15	1.17	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.45	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.46	+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between ENB.TO and SU.TO is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ENB.TO vs. SU.TO - Dividend Comparison

ENB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than SU.TO's 3.50% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENB.TO Enbridge Inc.	5.04%	5.74%	6.00%	7.45%	6.50%	6.76%	7.96%	5.72%	6.33%	4.91%	3.75%	4.04%
SU.TO Suncor Energy Inc.	3.50%	5.29%	5.89%	6.71%	5.68%	4.17%	6.80%	5.27%	4.93%	3.61%	3.50%	4.12%

Drawdowns

ENB.TO vs. SU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENB.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.20%, smaller than the maximum SU.TO drawdown of -73.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENB.TO and SU.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENB.TO	SU.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.20%	-73.98%	+25.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.59%	-19.86%	+10.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.38%	-30.38%	+9.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.47%	-70.10%	+30.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-0.53%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.28%	-22.13%	+11.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.89%	6.48%	-2.59%

Volatility

ENB.TO vs. SU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Enbridge Inc. (ENB.TO) is 3.70%, while Suncor Energy Inc. (SU.TO) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that ENB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENB.TO	SU.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	5.78%	-2.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.12%	15.18%	-4.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.87%	26.82%	-10.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.44%	30.53%	-15.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.42%	34.77%	-12.35%

Financials

ENB.TO vs. SU.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Enbridge Inc. and Suncor Energy Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ENB.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enbridge Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.67B and revenue of 17.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.1%.

SU.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Suncor Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.85B and revenue of 11.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.

ENB.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enbridge Inc. reported an operating income of 2.97B and revenue of 17.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

SU.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Suncor Energy Inc. reported an operating income of -29.00M and revenue of 11.28B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.

ENB.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enbridge Inc. reported a net income of 2.06B and revenue of 17.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.

SU.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Suncor Energy Inc. reported a net income of 1.48B and revenue of 11.28B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.