METW vs. TINY

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

METW (Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF) and TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - METW tracks the Ball Metaverse Index while TINY tracks the Solactive Nanotechnology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, METW returned -11.12% vs 83.39% for TINY. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METW charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for TINY.

Performance

METW vs. TINY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METW achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than TINY's 55.32% return.

METW

• 1D: -3.04%
• 1M: 12.30%
• 6M: 5.60%
• YTD: -2.29%
• 1Y: -11.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TINY

• 1D: -2.10%
• 1M: -7.89%
• 6M: 33.37%
• YTD: 55.32%
• 1Y: 83.39%
• 3Y*: 27.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METW vs. TINY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	-2.29%	-9.14%
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	55.32%	27.01%

Correlation

The correlation between METW and TINY is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.29

METW vs. TINY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	METW	TINY
Communication Services	23.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	9.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	4.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	10.4%
Industrials	-	4.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	70.5%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

METW vs. TINY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METW

METW Risk / Return Rank: 7
METW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
METW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
METW Omega Ratio Rank: 8
METW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
METW Martin Ratio Rank: 7

TINY

TINY Risk / Return Rank: 84
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 76
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METW vs. TINY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METW	TINY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	2.26	-2.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.04	2.76	-2.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.36	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.28	5.00	-5.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.50	15.29	-15.79

METW vs. TINY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METW Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the TINY Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METW and TINY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

METW vs. TINY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METW drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, smaller than the maximum TINY drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METW and TINY.

Drawdown Indicators

	METW	TINY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.52%	-43.79%	+3.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.52%	-16.75%	-23.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-42.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.47%	-14.81%	-7.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.77%	-15.90%	-2.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.42%	5.47%	+16.95%

Volatility

METW vs. TINY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) has a higher volatility of 18.87% compared to ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) at 16.86%. This indicates that METW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TINY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METW	TINY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.87%	16.86%	+2.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.21%	31.43%	+5.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.05%	37.06%	+8.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.04%	33.14%	+11.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.04%	33.14%	+11.90%

METW vs. TINY - Expense Ratio Comparison

METW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than TINY's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

METW vs. TINY - Dividend Comparison

METW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 53.86%, more than TINY's 0.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	53.86%	30.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	0.17%	0.29%	0.01%	0.35%	0.42%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METW and TINY in my portfolio?

METW and TINY have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, METW or TINY?

METW has higher volatility (18.87%) compared to TINY (16.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METW dropped -40.52% vs TINY's -43.79%.

Which ETF is better, METW or TINY?

On 1-year performance, TINY leads with 83.39% vs -11.12% for METW. On fees, TINY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, TINY has been the lower-risk option at 16.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, METW or TINY?

Over the 1-year period, TINY has performed better with a 83.39% return vs -11.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, METW or TINY?

TINY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for METW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METW or TINY?

METW has the higher dividend yield at 53.86%, compared with 0.17% for TINY.

What is the main difference between METW and TINY?

METW tracks Ball Metaverse Index, while TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for METW and 0.58% for TINY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.