PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METW vs. TDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METW vs. TDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METW achieves a -8.79% return, which is significantly lower than TDV's 23.09% return.


METW

1D
5.19%
1M
2.24%
YTD
-8.79%
6M
-5.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TDV

1D
-0.42%
1M
10.03%
YTD
23.09%
6M
21.07%
1Y
36.07%
3Y*
20.49%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METW vs. TDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between METW and TDV is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025

0.37

METW vs. TDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
METW
TDV

Communication Services

23.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

4.7%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

5.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

90.2%

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

METW
23.2%
TDV

-

Basic Materials

METW

-

TDV

-

Consumer Cyclical

METW

-

TDV

-

Consumer Defensive

METW

-

TDV

-

Energy

METW

-

TDV

-

Financial Services

METW

-

TDV
4.7%

Healthcare

METW

-

TDV

-

Industrials

METW

-

TDV
5.1%

Real Estate

METW

-

TDV

-

Technology

METW

-

TDV
90.2%

Utilities

METW

-

TDV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METW vs. TDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METW

TDV
TDV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
TDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METW vs. TDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

METW vs. TDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METWTDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.40

0.76

-1.16

Drawdowns

METW vs. TDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METW drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, which is greater than TDV's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METW and TDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METWTDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.52%

-32.78%

-7.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.63%

-0.42%

-27.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

-5.36%

-11.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

Volatility

METW vs. TDV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METWTDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.57%

17.29%

+25.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.57%

20.45%

+22.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.57%

23.20%

+19.37%

METW vs. TDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

METW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than TDV's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

METW vs. TDV - Dividend Comparison

METW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.37%, more than TDV's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
METW
Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF
55.37%30.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDV
ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF
0.93%1.09%1.16%1.16%1.67%1.08%1.10%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


METW and TDV have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, METW is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

METW is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for TDV.

METW has the higher dividend yield at 55.37%, compared with 0.93% for TDV.

METW tracks Ball Metaverse Index, while TDV tracks Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for METW and 0.66% for TDV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METW and TDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer