PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METU vs. TSLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METU vs. TSLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares (TSLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with METU having a -20.23% return and TSLL slightly lower at -20.85%.


METU

1D
8.31%
1M
2.33%
YTD
-20.23%
6M
-15.96%
1Y
-30.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLL

1D
0.00%
1M
13.88%
YTD
-20.85%
6M
-21.38%
1Y
7.17%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METU vs. TSLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
METU
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF
-20.23%-1.01%25.56%
TSLL
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares
-20.85%-26.80%284.15%

Correlation

The correlation between METU and TSLL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024

0.40

METU vs. TSLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
METU
TSLL

Communication Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

100.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

METU
100.0%
TSLL

-

Basic Materials

METU

-

TSLL

-

Consumer Cyclical

METU

-

TSLL
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

METU

-

TSLL

-

Energy

METU

-

TSLL

-

Financial Services

METU

-

TSLL

-

Healthcare

METU

-

TSLL

-

Industrials

METU

-

TSLL

-

Real Estate

METU

-

TSLL

-

Technology

METU

-

TSLL

-

Utilities

METU

-

TSLL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METU vs. TSLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METU
METU Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
METU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METU Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
METU Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
METU Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
METU Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLL
TSLL Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TSLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLL Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METU vs. TSLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares (TSLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


METUTSLLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.09

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

0.13

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.92

0.27

-1.20

METU vs. TSLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METU Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the TSLL Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METU and TSLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METUTSLLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

0.08

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

-0.08

+0.07

Drawdowns

METU vs. TSLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METU drawdown since its inception was -61.85%, smaller than the maximum TSLL drawdown of -82.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU and TSLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METUTSLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.85%

-82.88%

+21.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.52%

-54.75%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.01%

-60.03%

+11.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.55%

-53.82%

+30.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.23%

26.72%

+6.51%

Volatility

METU vs. TSLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) is 17.56%, while Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares (TSLL) has a volatility of 24.26%. This indicates that METU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METUTSLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.56%

24.26%

-6.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.29%

54.47%

-1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.38%

92.38%

-22.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.35%

106.87%

-34.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.35%

106.87%

-34.52%

METU vs. TSLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

METU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLL's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

METU vs. TSLL - Dividend Comparison

METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than TSLL's 6.46% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
METU
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF
3.87%3.00%1.40%0.00%0.00%
TSLL
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares
6.46%5.00%2.47%4.44%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


METU and TSLL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLL has higher volatility (24.26%) compared to METU (17.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METU dropped -61.85% vs TSLL's -82.88%.

On 1-year performance, TSLL leads with 7.17% vs -30.67% for METU. On fees, METU is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, METU has been the lower-risk option at 17.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLL has performed better with a 7.17% return vs -30.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

METU is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for TSLL.

TSLL has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 3.87% for METU.

Their fees differ too: 1.07% for METU and 1.08% for TSLL.

TSLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METU and TSLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer