METU vs. INTW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

METU (Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METU returned -30.67% vs 1617.48% for INTW. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METU charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

METU vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METU achieves a -20.23% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 562.71% return.

METU

• 1D: 8.31%
• 1M: 2.33%
• YTD: -20.23%
• 6M: -15.96%
• 1Y: -30.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INTW

• 1D: 8.89%
• 1M: 29.41%
• YTD: 562.71%
• 6M: 361.23%
• 1Y: 1,617.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METU vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF	-20.23%	-34.67%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	562.71%	50.41%

Correlation

The correlation between METU and INTW is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025	0.28

METU vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	METU	INTW
Communication Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	66.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

METU vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METU

METU Risk / Return Rank: 5
METU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
METU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
METU Omega Ratio Rank: 6
METU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
METU Martin Ratio Rank: 4

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 97
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 93
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METU vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	METU	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.44	11.42	-11.86
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.24	5.09	-5.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.64	-0.67
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.50	33.18	-33.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.92	77.63	-78.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

METU vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METU Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 11.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METU and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	METU	INTW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.44	11.42	-11.86
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	3.39	-3.40

Drawdowns

METU vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METU drawdown since its inception was -61.85%, roughly equal to the maximum INTW drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	METU	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.85%	-60.58%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.52%	-49.34%	-12.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.01%	-26.69%	-22.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.55%	-30.07%	+6.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.23%	21.05%	+12.18%

Volatility

METU vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) is 17.56%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 48.71%. This indicates that METU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METU	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.56%	48.71%	-31.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.29%	111.40%	-58.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.38%	143.36%	-72.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.35%	145.22%	-72.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.35%	145.22%	-72.87%

METU vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

METU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

METU vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF	3.87%	3.00%	1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METU and INTW in my portfolio?

METU and INTW have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, METU or INTW?

INTW has higher volatility (48.71%) compared to METU (17.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METU dropped -61.85% vs INTW's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, METU or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1617.48% vs -30.67% for METU. On fees, METU is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, METU has been the lower-risk option at 17.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, METU or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1617.48% return vs -30.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, METU or INTW?

METU is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METU or INTW?

METU has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

What is the main difference between METU and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for METU and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.42 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.