METU vs. DLLL
METU (Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF) and DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. METU is actively managed, while DLLL is passively managed. Over the past year, METU returned -30.67% vs 850.63% for DLLL. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METU charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DLLL.
Performance
METU vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METU achieves a -20.23% return, which is significantly lower than DLLL's 757.76% return.
METU
- 1D
- 8.31%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- -20.23%
- 6M
- -15.96%
- 1Y
- -30.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLLL
- 1D
- -6.45%
- 1M
- 245.92%
- YTD
- 757.76%
- 6M
- 648.38%
- 1Y
- 850.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METU vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | -20.23% | -34.67% |
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 757.76% | -3.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between METU and DLLL is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | 0.30 |
The correlation between METU and DLLL shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
METU vs. DLLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
METU
DLLL
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
METU
DLLL
-
Basic Materials
METU
-
DLLL
-
Consumer Cyclical
METU
-
DLLL
-
Consumer Defensive
METU
-
DLLL
-
Energy
METU
-
DLLL
-
Financial Services
METU
-
DLLL
-
Healthcare
METU
-
DLLL
-
Industrials
METU
-
DLLL
-
Real Estate
METU
-
DLLL
-
Technology
METU
-
DLLL
Utilities
METU
-
DLLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METU vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank
METU
DLLL
METU vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METU | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.60 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 15.02 | -15.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 31.34 | -32.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METU | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 6.65 | -7.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 3.16 | -3.16 |
Drawdowns
METU vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METU drawdown since its inception was -61.85%, smaller than the maximum DLLL drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU and DLLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METU | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.85% | -68.58% | +6.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.52% | -57.19% | -4.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.01% | -18.86% | -30.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.55% | -25.91% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.23% | 27.36% | +5.87% |
Volatility
METU vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) is 17.56%, while GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a volatility of 69.39%. This indicates that METU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DLLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METU | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.56% | 69.39% | -51.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.29% | 102.08% | -48.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.38% | 129.28% | -58.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.35% | 130.55% | -58.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.35% | 130.55% | -58.20% |
METU vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
METU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DLLL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
METU vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison
METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, while DLLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | 3.87% | 3.00% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METU and DLLL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DLLL has higher volatility (69.39%) compared to METU (17.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METU dropped -61.85% vs DLLL's -68.58%.
On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 850.63% vs -30.67% for METU. On fees, METU is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, METU has been the lower-risk option at 17.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 850.63% return vs -30.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
METU is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.
METU has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 0.00% for DLLL.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for METU and 1.50% for DLLL.
DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.65 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METU and DLLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer