METL vs. CCNR
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR).
METL and CCNR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. METL is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Sep 9, 2025. CCNR is an actively managed fund by ALPS. It was launched on Jul 10, 2024.
Performance
METL vs. CCNR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
METL vs. CCNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 8.85% | 27.04% |
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | 21.61% | 15.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METL achieves a 8.85% return, which is significantly lower than CCNR's 21.61% return.
METL
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -14.76%
- YTD
- 8.85%
- 6M
- 25.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCNR
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 21.61%
- 6M
- 32.84%
- 1Y
- 69.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
METL vs. CCNR - Expense Ratio Comparison
METL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than CCNR's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
METL vs. CCNR — Risk / Return Rank
METL
CCNR
METL vs. CCNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METL | CCNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | 1.63 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between METL and CCNR is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
METL vs. CCNR - Dividend Comparison
METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than CCNR's 2.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 0.91% | 0.99% | 0.00% |
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | 2.86% | 3.48% | 1.27% |
Drawdowns
METL vs. CCNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -27.39%, which is greater than CCNR's maximum drawdown of -20.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and CCNR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| METL | CCNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.39% | -20.06% | -7.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.47% | -2.12% | -15.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.83% | -3.81% | -3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.73% | — |
Volatility
METL vs. CCNR - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| METL | CCNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.84% | 22.40% | +22.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.84% | 20.39% | +24.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.84% | 20.39% | +24.45% |