METL vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - METL is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Sprott, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. METL is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. METL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

METL vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METL achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 68.86% return.

METL

• 1D: 3.12%
• 1M: -9.34%
• YTD: 11.55%
• 6M: 15.65%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: -2.67%
• 1M: -14.38%
• YTD: 68.86%
• 6M: 69.27%
• 1Y: 60.25%
• 3Y*: 24.15%
• 5Y*: 20.89%
• 10Y*: 12.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METL vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	11.55%	28.19%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	68.86%	-5.22%

Correlation

The correlation between METL and BNO is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025	-0.17

Return for Risk

METL vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 50
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METL vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METL	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.44	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.00	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.96	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.16	—

Drawdowns

METL vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -27.39%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	METL	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.39%	-87.06%	+59.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-20.47%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.42%	-20.47%	+5.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.42%	-40.12%	+31.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	METL	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.86%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.89%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.21%	41.93%	+3.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.21%	35.52%	+9.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.21%	36.72%	+8.49%

METL vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

METL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

METL vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	0.89%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METL and BNO in my portfolio?

METL and BNO have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, METL or BNO?

On fees, METL is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, METL or BNO?

METL is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METL or BNO?

METL has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between METL and BNO?

METL is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for METL and 0.90% for BNO.