METI.L vs. WINC.L
METI.L (IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP) and WINC.L (iShares World Equity High Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - METI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while WINC.L is a Dividend fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METI.L returned -22.49% vs 20.73% for WINC.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for WINC.L.
Performance
METI.L vs. WINC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
METI.L is traded in GBp, while WINC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the WINC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METI.L achieves a -17.17% return, which is significantly lower than WINC.L's 9.72% return.
METI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10.40%
- 6M
- -12.76%
- YTD
- -17.17%
- 1Y
- -22.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WINC.L
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- 7.47%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 1Y
- 20.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METI.L vs. WINC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
METI.L IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP | -17.17% | -0.90% | 3.56% |
WINC.L iShares World Equity High Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 9.72% | 11.87% | 4.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between METI.L and WINC.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2024 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METI.L vs. WINC.L — Risk / Return Rank
METI.L
WINC.L
METI.L vs. WINC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) and iShares World Equity High Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WINC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| METI.L | WINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.37 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 3.85 | -4.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.61 | 14.26 | -14.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
METI.L vs. WINC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METI.L drawdown since its inception was -52.76%, which is greater than WINC.L's maximum drawdown of -16.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METI.L and WINC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METI.L | WINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.76% | -16.51% | -36.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.76% | -5.36% | -47.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.92% | -1.67% | -44.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.54% | -2.06% | -21.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.75% | 1.45% | +35.30% |
Volatility
METI.L vs. WINC.L - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) has a higher volatility of 12.90% compared to iShares World Equity High Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WINC.L) at 3.60%. This indicates that METI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WINC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METI.L | WINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.90% | 3.60% | +9.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.50% | 7.42% | +19.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.55% | 10.25% | +42.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.42% | 11.63% | +32.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.42% | 11.63% | +32.79% |
METI.L vs. WINC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
METI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than WINC.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
METI.L vs. WINC.L - Dividend Comparison
METI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.65%, more than WINC.L's 9.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
METI.L IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP | 20.65% | 20.59% | 3.05% |
WINC.L iShares World Equity High Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 9.95% | 9.75% | 4.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METI.L and WINC.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WINC.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WINC.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for METI.L.
METI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while WINC.L is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for METI.L and 0.35% for WINC.L.
Find the right allocation for METI.L and WINC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer