PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
METI.L vs. GLDE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

METI.L vs. GLDE.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

METI.L (IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP) and GLDE.L (IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP) are both Derivative Income funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. METI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GLDE.L.

Performance

METI.L vs. GLDE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) and IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP (GLDE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

METI.L

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

GLDE.L

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP

IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP

Often compared with METI.L:
METI.L vs. AMDI.LMETI.L vs. TLTI.LMETI.L vs. SOXL.LMETI.L vs. JEPE.LMETI.L vs. SMH3.LMETI.L vs. QQQY.LMETI.L vs. 3QQQ.L
Often compared with GLDE.L:
GLDE.L vs. RMAP.LGLDE.L vs. SPYGLDE.L vs. TSLD.LGLDE.L vs. MSTI.LGLDE.L vs. IGLN.LGLDE.L vs. JEGA.LGLDE.L vs. CEGI.L

Return for Risk

METI.L vs. GLDE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) and IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP (GLDE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

METI.L vs. GLDE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

METI.L vs. GLDE.L - Drawdown Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility

METI.L vs. GLDE.L - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

METI.L vs. GLDE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

METI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDE.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

METI.L vs. GLDE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither METI.L nor GLDE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

On fees, GLDE.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLDE.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for METI.L.

Their fees differ too: 0.55% for METI.L and 0.35% for GLDE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METI.L and GLDE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer