GLDE.L vs. RMAP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP (GLDE.L) and HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L).
GLDE.L and RMAP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLDE.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jul 18, 2024. RMAP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Feb 12, 2020.
Performance
GLDE.L vs. RMAP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLDE.L vs. RMAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GLDE.L IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP | 2.76% | 42.81% | 7.05% |
RMAP.L HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC | 11.90% | 53.50% | 11.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDE.L achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly lower than RMAP.L's 11.90% return.
GLDE.L
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -10.21%
- YTD
- 2.76%
- 6M
- 12.31%
- 1Y
- 26.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RMAP.L
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -9.61%
- YTD
- 11.90%
- 6M
- 25.06%
- 1Y
- 47.87%
- 3Y*
- 30.57%
- 5Y*
- 23.30%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLDE.L vs. RMAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDE.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than RMAP.L's 0.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLDE.L vs. RMAP.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLDE.L
RMAP.L
GLDE.L vs. RMAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP (GLDE.L) and HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDE.L | RMAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 0.99 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.58 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.37 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 1.78 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.35 | 3.99 | +2.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDE.L | RMAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.99 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.62 | 0.78 | +0.84 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDE.L and RMAP.L is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLDE.L vs. RMAP.L - Dividend Comparison
GLDE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, while RMAP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GLDE.L IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP | 4.70% | 4.82% | 0.38% |
RMAP.L HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GLDE.L vs. RMAP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDE.L drawdown since its inception was -16.63%, smaller than the maximum RMAP.L drawdown of -27.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDE.L and RMAP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDE.L | RMAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.63% | -27.31% | +10.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.63% | -27.31% | +10.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.21% | -12.71% | +2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -7.03% | +4.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 12.14% | -7.93% |
Volatility
GLDE.L vs. RMAP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP (GLDE.L) is 10.57%, while HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L) has a volatility of 11.48%. This indicates that GLDE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMAP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLDE.L | RMAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.57% | 11.48% | -0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.94% | 47.06% | -28.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.01% | 48.10% | -26.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 24.74% | -5.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 23.90% | -5.14% |