METI.L vs. COII.L
METI.L (IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP) and COII.L (IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP) are both Derivative Income funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METI.L returned -22.49% vs -72.04% for COII.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.
Performance
METI.L vs. COII.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METI.L achieves a -17.17% return, which is significantly higher than COII.L's -43.62% return.
METI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10.40%
- 6M
- -12.76%
- YTD
- -17.17%
- 1Y
- -22.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COII.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- 6M
- -43.65%
- YTD
- -43.62%
- 1Y
- -72.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METI.L vs. COII.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
METI.L IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP | -17.17% | -0.90% | 3.56% |
COII.L IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP | -43.62% | -47.27% | 12.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between METI.L and COII.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2024 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METI.L vs. COII.L — Risk / Return Rank
METI.L
COII.L
METI.L vs. COII.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) and IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| METI.L | COII.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.78 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | -0.95 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.61 | -1.29 | +0.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
METI.L vs. COII.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METI.L drawdown since its inception was -52.76%, smaller than the maximum COII.L drawdown of -77.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METI.L and COII.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METI.L | COII.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.76% | -77.03% | +24.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.76% | -76.10% | +23.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.92% | -74.59% | +28.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.54% | -37.54% | +14.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.75% | 55.68% | -18.93% |
Volatility
METI.L vs. COII.L - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) and IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) have volatilities of 12.90% and 13.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METI.L | COII.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.90% | 13.32% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.50% | 43.42% | -16.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.55% | 78.50% | -25.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.42% | 68.55% | -24.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.42% | 68.55% | -24.13% |
METI.L vs. COII.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both METI.L and COII.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Dividends
METI.L vs. COII.L - Dividend Comparison
METI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.65%, less than COII.L's 83.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
COII.L IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP | 83.24% | 191.72% | 18.98% |
METI.L IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP | 20.65% | 20.59% | 3.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METI.L and COII.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
METI.L and COII.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.
Find the right allocation for METI.L and COII.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer