COII.L vs. GPIQ
Compare and contrast key facts about IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ).
COII.L and GPIQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COII.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Sep 26, 2024. GPIQ is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Oct 24, 2023.
Performance
COII.L vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COII.L vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
COII.L IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP | -43.33% | -47.27% | 15.90% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | -2.07% | 11.24% | 12.72% |
Different Trading Currencies
COII.L is traded in GBp, while GPIQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GPIQ values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COII.L achieves a -43.33% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's -2.07% return.
COII.L
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -12.66%
- YTD
- -43.33%
- 6M
- -66.12%
- 1Y
- -60.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPIQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- -2.07%
- 6M
- 1.04%
- 1Y
- 19.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COII.L vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
COII.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
COII.L vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank
COII.L
GPIQ
COII.L vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COII.L | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | 0.95 | -1.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | 1.48 | -3.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.23 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 1.85 | -2.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 6.82 | -8.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COII.L | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.02 | 0.95 | -1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.85 | 1.03 | -1.88 |
Correlation
The correlation between COII.L and GPIQ is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
COII.L vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison
COII.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 168.09%, more than GPIQ's 10.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COII.L IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP | 129.31% | 191.72% | 18.99% | 0.00% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 10.75% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% |
Drawdowns
COII.L vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COII.L drawdown since its inception was -76.00%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -23.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COII.L and GPIQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COII.L | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.00% | -21.06% | -54.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.77% | -12.08% | -62.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.46% | -5.62% | -68.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.84% | -2.38% | -27.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.52% | 2.64% | +36.88% |
Volatility
COII.L vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) has a higher volatility of 17.50% compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) at 5.21%. This indicates that COII.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COII.L | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.50% | 5.21% | +12.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.63% | 10.93% | +34.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.07% | 20.78% | +38.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.47% | 17.82% | +41.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.47% | 17.82% | +41.65% |