PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METE.TO vs. QBTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METE.TO vs. QBTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) and Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

METE.TO is traded in CAD, while QBTX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QBTX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METE.TO achieves a -4.55% return, which is significantly higher than QBTX's -33.54% return.


METE.TO

1D
5.47%
1M
4.67%
YTD
-4.55%
6M
-2.86%
1Y
-5.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QBTX

1D
-15.70%
1M
49.21%
YTD
-33.54%
6M
-37.37%
1Y
-31.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METE.TO vs. QBTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between METE.TO and QBTX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METE.TO vs. QBTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METE.TO
METE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
METE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
METE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
METE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
METE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

QBTX
QBTX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
QBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
QBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METE.TO vs. QBTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) and Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


METE.TOQBTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.16

-0.15

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.02

1.41

-1.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.15

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

-0.33

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.36

-0.47

+0.11

METE.TO vs. QBTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METE.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is comparable to the QBTX Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METE.TO and QBTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METE.TOQBTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

-0.15

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.63

-0.72

Drawdowns

METE.TO vs. QBTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METE.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.10%, smaller than the maximum QBTX drawdown of -95.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METE.TO and QBTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METE.TOQBTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.10%

-95.51%

+55.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.48%

-95.51%

+60.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.07%

-85.00%

+62.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.68%

-56.36%

+40.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.51%

67.14%

-50.63%

Volatility

METE.TO vs. QBTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) is 9.99%, while Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) has a volatility of 77.39%. This indicates that METE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METE.TOQBTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.99%

77.39%

-67.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.26%

148.72%

-120.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.57%

214.56%

-177.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.08%

242.16%

-200.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.08%

242.16%

-200.08%

METE.TO vs. QBTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

METE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than QBTX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

METE.TO vs. QBTX - Dividend Comparison

METE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.77%, more than QBTX's 20.11% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


METE.TO and QBTX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, METE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

METE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QBTX.

METE.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while QBTX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Harvest Portfolios Group and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for METE.TO and 1.30% for QBTX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METE.TO and QBTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer