METC vs. LYC.AX
METC (Ramaco Resources, Inc.) and LYC.AX (Lynas Rare Earths Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — METC in Coking Coal, LYC.AX in Other Industrial Metals & Mining. Over the past 5 years, METC returned 24.30%/yr vs 25.65%/yr for LYC.AX. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
METC vs. LYC.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
METC is traded in USD, while LYC.AX is traded in AUD. To make them comparable, the LYC.AX values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METC achieves a -25.50% return, which is significantly lower than LYC.AX's 56.76% return.
METC
- 1D
- -4.15%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- -25.50%
- 6M
- -13.82%
- 1Y
- 22.24%
- 3Y*
- 23.09%
- 5Y*
- 24.30%
- 10Y*
- —
LYC.AX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- YTD
- 56.76%
- 6M
- 56.64%
- 1Y
- 117.56%
- 3Y*
- 39.70%
- 5Y*
- 25.65%
- 10Y*
- 39.79%
METC vs. LYC.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc. | -25.50% | 94.40% | -37.24% | 105.93% | -32.97% | 372.22% | -19.55% | -27.68% | -28.05% | -52.71% |
LYC.AX Lynas Rare Earths Limited | 56.76% | 108.58% | -18.38% | -8.85% | -27.65% | 141.27% | 89.91% | 46.89% | -34.50% | 144.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between METC and LYC.AX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METC vs. LYC.AX — Risk / Return Rank
METC
LYC.AX
METC vs. LYC.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and Lynas Rare Earths Limited (LYC.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| METC | LYC.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.32 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 2.71 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.40 | 5.93 | -5.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
METC vs. LYC.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METC drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, smaller than the maximum LYC.AX drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METC and LYC.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METC | LYC.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -99.18% | +12.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.80% | -42.86% | -32.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.80% | -42.86% | -32.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.80% | -57.94% | -17.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.42% | -51.65% | -23.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.09% | -75.70% | +23.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 55.59% | 19.75% | +35.84% |
Volatility
METC vs. LYC.AX - Volatility Comparison
Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) has a higher volatility of 22.81% compared to Lynas Rare Earths Limited (LYC.AX) at 12.05%. This indicates that METC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYC.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METC | LYC.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.81% | 12.05% | +10.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.10% | 44.17% | +17.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.23% | 59.95% | +42.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.35% | 48.16% | +34.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.86% | 56.98% | +18.88% |
Dividends
METC vs. LYC.AX - Dividend Comparison
Neither METC nor LYC.AX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYC.AX Lynas Rare Earths Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc. | 0.00% | 1.10% | 5.32% | 2.91% | 5.11% |
Financials
METC vs. LYC.AX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ramaco Resources, Inc. and Lynas Rare Earths Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
METC and LYC.AX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for METC and LYC.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer