META vs. XLM-USD
META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock, while XLM-USD (Stellar) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 10 years, META returned 17.39%/yr vs 60.23%/yr for XLM-USD. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
META vs. XLM-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -14.03% return, which is significantly lower than XLM-USD's -6.87% return. Over the past 10 years, META has underperformed XLM-USD with an annualized return of 17.39%, while XLM-USD has yielded a comparatively higher 60.23% annualized return.
META
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- YTD
- -14.03%
- 6M
- -11.84%
- 1Y
- -16.71%
- 3Y*
- 28.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
XLM-USD
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 15.17%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- -21.39%
- 1Y
- -28.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.09%
- 5Y*
- -11.45%
- 10Y*
- 60.23%
META vs. XLM-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -14.03% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
XLM-USD Stellar | -6.87% | -39.55% | 157.40% | 81.66% | -73.35% | 108.68% | 184.76% | -60.36% | -68.37% | 14,396.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between META and XLM-USD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2014 | 0.09 |
The correlation between META and XLM-USD shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
META vs. XLM-USD — Risk / Return Rank
META
XLM-USD
META vs. XLM-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Stellar (XLM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| META | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.00 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | -0.40 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | -0.57 | -0.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
META vs. XLM-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, smaller than the maximum XLM-USD drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and XLM-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| META | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -96.21% | +19.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.30% | -71.19% | +37.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.15% | -74.37% | +40.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.74% | -83.25% | +6.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.74% | -96.21% | +19.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.06% | -78.80% | +50.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.83% | -72.14% | +56.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.06% | 50.48% | -34.42% |
Volatility
META vs. XLM-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) is 10.17%, while Stellar (XLM-USD) has a volatility of 43.48%. This indicates that META experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| META | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.17% | 43.48% | -33.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.91% | 59.28% | -32.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.52% | 70.60% | -35.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.04% | 74.72% | -30.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.67% | 112.79% | -74.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
META and XLM-USD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLM-USD has higher volatility (43.48%) compared to META (10.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs XLM-USD's -96.21%.
XLM-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for META and XLM-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer