META vs. NLR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock, while NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) is Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Over the past 10 years, META returned 17.39%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for NLR. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

META vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -14.03% return, which is significantly lower than NLR's -1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, META has outperformed NLR with an annualized return of 17.39%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively lower 12.80% annualized return.

META

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -7.69%
• YTD: -14.03%
• 6M: -11.84%
• 1Y: -16.71%
• 3Y*: 28.18%
• 5Y*: 11.52%
• 10Y*: 17.39%

NLR

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -9.40%
• YTD: -1.81%
• 6M: -3.70%
• 1Y: 19.00%
• 3Y*: 29.88%
• 5Y*: 19.78%
• 10Y*: 12.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

META vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-14.03%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-64.22%	23.13%	33.09%	56.57%	-25.71%	53.38%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	-1.81%	56.50%	14.26%	36.67%	2.29%	13.63%	3.49%	0.20%	4.94%	8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between META and NLR is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012	0.29

Return for Risk

META vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 21
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
META Omega Ratio Rank: 20
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
META Martin Ratio Rank: 18

NLR

NLR Risk / Return Rank: 18
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 18
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

META vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	META	NLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	0.44	-0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.54	0.90	-1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.10	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.54	0.63	-1.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.12	1.41	-2.53

META vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current META Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of META and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

META vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than NLR's maximum drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and NLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	META	NLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.74%	-65.05%	-11.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.30%	-29.72%	-3.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.15%	-30.48%	-3.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.74%	-30.48%	-46.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.74%	-34.35%	-42.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.06%	-25.81%	-2.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.83%	-35.70%	+19.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.06%	13.33%	+2.73%

Volatility

META vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) is 10.17%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.73%. This indicates that META experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	META	NLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.17%	13.73%	-3.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.91%	33.75%	-6.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.52%	42.85%	-7.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.04%	29.56%	+14.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.67%	24.22%	+14.45%

Dividends

META vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than NLR's 2.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.37%	0.32%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	2.60%	2.55%	0.76%	4.54%	2.02%	1.99%	2.23%	2.21%	3.91%	4.86%	3.62%	3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both META and NLR in my portfolio?

META and NLR have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, META or NLR?

NLR has higher volatility (13.73%) compared to META (10.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs NLR's -65.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.