META vs. METU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock, while METU (Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. Over the past year, META returned -6.29% vs -30.67% for METU. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep.

Performance

META vs. METU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -5.54% return, which is significantly higher than METU's -20.23% return.

META

• 1D: 4.24%
• 1M: 2.06%
• YTD: -5.54%
• 6M: -2.44%
• 1Y: -6.29%
• 3Y*: 32.06%
• 5Y*: 13.70%
• 10Y*: 18.15%

METU

• 1D: 8.31%
• 1M: 2.33%
• YTD: -20.23%
• 6M: -15.96%
• 1Y: -30.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

META vs. METU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-5.54%	13.09%	18.60%
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF	-20.23%	-1.01%	25.56%

Correlation

The correlation between META and METU is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024	1.00

The correlation between META and METU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

META vs. METU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 32
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
META Omega Ratio Rank: 29
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
META Martin Ratio Rank: 34

METU

METU Risk / Return Rank: 5
METU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
METU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
METU Omega Ratio Rank: 6
METU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
METU Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

META vs. METU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	META	METU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.18	-0.44	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.01	-0.24	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	0.97	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	-0.50	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.41	-0.92	+0.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

META vs. METU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current META Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is higher than the METU Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of META and METU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	META	METU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18	-0.44	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	-0.01	+0.56

Drawdowns

META vs. METU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than METU's maximum drawdown of -61.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and METU.

Drawdown Indicators

	META	METU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.74%	-61.85%	-14.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.30%	-61.52%	+28.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.96%	-49.01%	+28.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.25%	-23.55%	+8.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.47%	33.23%	-17.76%

Volatility

META vs. METU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) is 8.84%, while Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a volatility of 17.56%. This indicates that META experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	META	METU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.84%	17.56%	-8.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.58%	53.29%	-26.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.23%	70.38%	-35.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.99%	72.35%	-28.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.64%	72.35%	-33.71%

Dividends

META vs. METU - Dividend Comparison

META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than METU's 3.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.34%	0.32%	0.34%
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF	3.87%	3.00%	1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both META and METU in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, META and METU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, META or METU?

METU has higher volatility (17.56%) compared to META (8.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs METU's -61.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

META currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.18 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.