META vs. GC=F

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock, while GC=F (Gold Futures) is an asset. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

META vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Gold Futures (GC=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

META

• 1D: 4.77%
• 1M: -3.29%
• YTD: -9.93%
• 6M: -8.18%
• 1Y: -12.74%
• 3Y*: 28.68%
• 5Y*: 12.58%
• 10Y*: 18.14%

GC=F

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

META vs. GC=F - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-9.93%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-60.11%
GC=F Gold Futures	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between META and GC=F is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022	-0.08

Return for Risk

META vs. GC=F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 27
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
META Omega Ratio Rank: 25
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
META Martin Ratio Rank: 27

GC=F

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

META vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Gold Futures (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	META	GC=F	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.36	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.29	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.38	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.79	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	META	GC=F	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.63%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.83%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.13%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	META	GC=F	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.35%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.33%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.89%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.10%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.72%	—	—

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both META and GC=F in my portfolio?

META and GC=F have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.