PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEME vs. IBHE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEME vs. IBHE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MEME

1D
4.46%
1M
34.40%
YTD
89.03%
6M
82.84%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBHE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.13%
1Y
2.31%
3Y*
6.07%
5Y*
3.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEME vs. IBHE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MEME and IBHE is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025

-0.08

MEME vs. IBHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MEME
IBHE

Technology

58.8%

-

Industrials

29.9%

-

Utilities

10.7%

-

Financial Services

5.7%

-

Communication Services

5.5%

-

Healthcare

5.4%

-

Energy

4.8%

-

Basic Materials

4.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

100.0%

Technology

MEME
58.8%
IBHE

-

Industrials

MEME
29.9%
IBHE

-

Utilities

MEME
10.7%
IBHE

-

Financial Services

MEME
5.7%
IBHE

-

Communication Services

MEME
5.5%
IBHE

-

Healthcare

MEME
5.4%
IBHE

-

Energy

MEME
4.8%
IBHE

-

Basic Materials

MEME
4.6%
IBHE

-

Consumer Cyclical

MEME

-

IBHE

-

Consumer Defensive

MEME

-

IBHE

-

Real Estate

MEME

-

IBHE
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEME vs. IBHE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEME

IBHE
IBHE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IBHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHE Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEME vs. IBHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MEME vs. IBHE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEMEIBHEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.41

+0.02

Drawdowns

MEME vs. IBHE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEME drawdown since its inception was -48.78%, which is greater than IBHE's maximum drawdown of -26.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEME and IBHE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEMEIBHEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.78%

-26.91%

-21.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

0.00%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.05%

-1.42%

-28.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

Volatility

MEME vs. IBHE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEMEIBHEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.11%

0.81%

+73.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.11%

4.87%

+69.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.11%

11.53%

+62.58%

MEME vs. IBHE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEME has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEME vs. IBHE - Dividend Comparison

MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IBHE
iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF
2.29%4.53%6.92%7.17%5.77%4.84%5.74%3.73%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEME and IBHE have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBHE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBHE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

IBHE has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

MEME is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IBHE is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for MEME and 0.35% for IBHE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEME and IBHE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer