MEMA vs. XC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MEMA (Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF) and XC (WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. MEMA is actively managed, while XC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MEMA charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for XC.

Performance

MEMA vs. XC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF (MEMA) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEMA achieves a 26.01% return, which is significantly higher than XC's -3.47% return.

MEMA

• 1D: -1.65%
• 1M: 5.93%
• YTD: 26.01%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XC

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: -1.76%
• YTD: -3.47%
• 6M: -2.10%
• 1Y: 8.33%
• 3Y*: 9.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEMA vs. XC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MEMA Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF	26.01%	2.94%
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	-3.47%	1.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MEMA and XC is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025	0.80

Return for Risk

MEMA vs. XC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XC

XC Risk / Return Rank: 18
XC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
XC Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
XC Omega Ratio Rank: 17
XC Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
XC Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEMA vs. XC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF (MEMA) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MEMA	XC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.03	0.71	+2.31

Drawdowns

MEMA vs. XC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEMA drawdown since its inception was -13.12%, smaller than the maximum XC drawdown of -20.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEMA and XC.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEMA	XC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.12%	-20.97%	+7.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.47%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.65%	-9.35%	+7.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.70%	-4.12%	+1.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.29%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MEMA	XC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.60%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.81%	14.78%	+11.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.81%	15.87%	+9.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.81%	15.87%	+9.94%

MEMA vs. XC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEMA has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XC's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

MEMA vs. XC - Dividend Comparison

MEMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.41%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MEMA Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	12.41%	11.74%	1.49%	1.42%	0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEMA and XC in my portfolio?

MEMA and XC have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MEMA or XC?

On fees, XC is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MEMA or XC?

XC is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MEMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MEMA or XC?

XC has the higher dividend yield at 12.41%, compared with 0.00% for MEMA.

What is the main difference between MEMA and XC?

They also come from different issuers: Man Group and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MEMA and 0.32% for XC.