PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEMA vs. MATE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEMA vs. MATE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF (MEMA) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEMA achieves a 26.01% return, which is significantly higher than MATE's 20.78% return.


MEMA

1D
-1.65%
1M
5.93%
YTD
26.01%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MATE

1D
-0.07%
1M
7.70%
YTD
20.78%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEMA vs. MATE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MEMA and MATE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEMA vs. MATE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF (MEMA) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MEMA vs. MATE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEMAMATEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.03

3.07

-0.04

Drawdowns

MEMA vs. MATE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEMA drawdown since its inception was -13.12%, roughly equal to the maximum MATE drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEMA and MATE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEMAMATEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.12%

-13.24%

+0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-0.07%

-1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-3.27%

+0.57%

Volatility

MEMA vs. MATE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEMAMATEDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.81%

21.76%

+4.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.81%

21.76%

+4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.81%

21.76%

+4.05%

MEMA vs. MATE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEMA has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than MATE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEMA vs. MATE - Dividend Comparison

Neither MEMA nor MATE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MEMA and MATE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MEMA is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MEMA is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.

MEMA and MATE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

MEMA is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while MATE is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MEMA and 0.97% for MATE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEMA and MATE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer