MEMA vs. DGS
MEMA (Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF) and DGS (WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. MEMA is actively managed, while DGS is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MEMA charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for DGS.
Performance
MEMA vs. DGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEMA achieves a 26.01% return, which is significantly higher than DGS's 14.53% return.
MEMA
- 1D
- -1.65%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 26.01%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGS
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 14.53%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- 27.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
MEMA vs. DGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MEMA Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF | 26.01% | 2.94% |
DGS WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund | 14.53% | 3.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEMA and DGS is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEMA vs. DGS — Risk / Return Rank
MEMA
DGS
MEMA vs. DGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF (MEMA) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MEMA | DGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.03 | 0.23 | +2.80 |
Drawdowns
MEMA vs. DGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEMA drawdown since its inception was -13.12%, smaller than the maximum DGS drawdown of -61.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEMA and DGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEMA | DGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.12% | -61.83% | +48.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.65% | -1.40% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.70% | -12.59% | +9.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.98% | — |
Volatility
MEMA vs. DGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEMA | DGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.81% | 15.56% | +10.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.81% | 14.87% | +10.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.81% | 17.32% | +8.49% |
MEMA vs. DGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEMA has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DGS's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
MEMA vs. DGS - Dividend Comparison
MEMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGS WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund | 3.21% | 3.45% | 3.36% | 4.55% | 5.34% | 3.98% | 3.69% | 3.95% | 4.24% | 2.81% | 3.42% | 3.28% |
MEMA Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMA and DGS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MEMA.
DGS has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 0.00% for MEMA.
They also come from different issuers: Man Group and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MEMA and 0.58% for DGS.
Find the right allocation for MEMA and DGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer