PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEGMX vs. FGOMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEGMX vs. FGOMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEGMX achieves a 30.81% return, which is significantly higher than FGOMX's 27.64% return.


MEGMX

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
30.81%
6M
32.10%
1Y
49.44%
3Y*
24.86%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*

FGOMX

1D
0.54%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
27.64%
6M
28.71%
1Y
49.68%
3Y*
24.97%
5Y*
8.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEGMX vs. FGOMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MEGMX
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund
30.81%29.37%11.11%8.46%-20.94%-1.90%61.26%
FGOMX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
27.64%34.20%7.88%12.23%-22.45%-0.19%44.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MEGMX and FGOMX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2020

0.90

The correlation between MEGMX and FGOMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEGMX vs. FGOMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEGMX
MEGMX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
MEGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MEGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FGOMX
FGOMX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FGOMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGOMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGOMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FGOMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGOMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEGMX vs. FGOMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MEGMXFGOMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.51

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

4.77

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.44

17.33

-4.89

MEGMX vs. FGOMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEGMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the FGOMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEGMX and FGOMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MEGMX vs. FGOMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEGMX drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, smaller than the maximum FGOMX drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEGMX and FGOMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEGMXFGOMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.64%

-40.14%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.34%

-12.77%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-16.71%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.03%

-37.84%

+0.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.01%

-4.56%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.47%

-13.28%

-1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

3.25%

+0.85%

Volatility

MEGMX vs. FGOMX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) has a higher volatility of 14.35% compared to Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX) at 12.05%. This indicates that MEGMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGOMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEGMXFGOMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.35%

12.05%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.63%

18.98%

+2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.40%

21.88%

+1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.50%

18.51%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

19.64%

-1.23%

MEGMX vs. FGOMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEGMX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FGOMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEGMX vs. FGOMX - Dividend Comparison

MEGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than FGOMX's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FGOMX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
1.70%2.17%2.40%2.83%2.42%4.63%0.73%2.13%
MEGMX
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund
2.27%2.97%0.92%1.82%1.81%7.76%2.26%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEGMX and FGOMX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEGMX has higher volatility (14.35%) compared to FGOMX (12.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEGMX dropped -37.64% vs FGOMX's -40.14%.

FGOMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEGMX and FGOMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer