FGOMX vs. FSAMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FGOMX (Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund) and FSAMX (Strategic Advisers Emerging Markets Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FGOMX returned 9.22%/yr vs 8.42%/yr for FSAMX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FGOMX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for FSAMX.

Performance

FGOMX vs. FSAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX) and Strategic Advisers Emerging Markets Fund (FSAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGOMX achieves a 33.73% return, which is significantly higher than FSAMX's 31.57% return.

FGOMX

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: 11.58%
• YTD: 33.73%
• 6M: 37.15%
• 1Y: 64.79%
• 3Y*: 27.19%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: —

FSAMX

• 1D: 2.46%
• 1M: 11.21%
• YTD: 31.57%
• 6M: 34.89%
• 1Y: 62.55%
• 3Y*: 26.44%
• 5Y*: 8.42%
• 10Y*: 11.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGOMX vs. FSAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGOMX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund	33.73%	34.20%	7.88%	12.23%	-22.45%	-0.19%	22.10%	22.25%	-4.83%
FSAMX Strategic Advisers Emerging Markets Fund	31.57%	34.09%	8.34%	11.94%	-22.32%	-2.15%	20.39%	21.87%	-2.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FGOMX and FSAMX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018	0.97

The correlation between FGOMX and FSAMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGOMX vs. FSAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGOMX

FGOMX Risk / Return Rank: 96
FGOMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FGOMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FGOMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FGOMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FGOMX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

FSAMX

FSAMX Risk / Return Rank: 95
FSAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FSAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FSAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FSAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FSAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGOMX vs. FSAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX) and Strategic Advisers Emerging Markets Fund (FSAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGOMX	FSAMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.34	4.12	+0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.42	5.19	+0.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.76	1.73	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.32	5.40	+0.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	24.86	20.58	+4.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGOMX vs. FSAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGOMX Sharpe Ratio is 4.34, which is comparable to the FSAMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGOMX and FSAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGOMX	FSAMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.34	4.12	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.50	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.35	+0.30

Drawdowns

FGOMX vs. FSAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGOMX drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, roughly equal to the maximum FSAMX drawdown of -40.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGOMX and FSAMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGOMX	FSAMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.14%	-40.87%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.77%	-13.04%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.71%	-16.77%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.04%	-38.64%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.36%	-13.93%	+0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.24%	3.42%	-0.18%

Volatility

FGOMX vs. FSAMX - Volatility Comparison

Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX) and Strategic Advisers Emerging Markets Fund (FSAMX) have volatilities of 7.45% and 7.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGOMX	FSAMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.45%	7.56%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.74%	15.76%	-0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.63%	18.68%	-0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.86%	17.54%	+0.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.31%	17.97%	+1.34%

FGOMX vs. FSAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGOMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FSAMX's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGOMX vs. FSAMX - Dividend Comparison

FGOMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than FSAMX's 4.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGOMX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund	1.62%	2.17%	2.40%	2.83%	2.42%	4.63%	0.73%	2.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FSAMX Strategic Advisers Emerging Markets Fund	4.70%	2.38%	2.53%	2.57%	2.64%	3.04%	0.99%	2.09%	1.67%	1.30%	1.22%	1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGOMX and FSAMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, FGOMX and FSAMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FGOMX or FSAMX?

FSAMX has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to FGOMX (7.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGOMX dropped -40.14% vs FSAMX's -40.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGOMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.34 vs 4.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.