MEGMX vs. FCEEX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

MEGMX (Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and FCEEX (Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, MEGMX returned 7.34%/yr vs 9.39%/yr for FCEEX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MEGMX charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for FCEEX.

Performance

MEGMX vs. FCEEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEGMX achieves a 25.20% return, which is significantly higher than FCEEX's 21.57% return.

MEGMX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -6.47%
• 6M: 18.48%
• YTD: 25.20%
• 1Y: 40.46%
• 3Y*: 21.58%
• 5Y*: 7.34%
• 10Y*: —

FCEEX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -4.20%
• 6M: 14.85%
• YTD: 21.57%
• 1Y: 37.62%
• 3Y*: 22.62%
• 5Y*: 9.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEGMX vs. FCEEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MEGMX Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund	25.20%	29.37%	11.11%	8.46%	-20.94%	-1.90%	61.26%
FCEEX Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	21.57%	34.81%	10.51%	12.52%	-16.96%	-1.29%	28.44%

Correlation

The correlation between MEGMX and FCEEX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2020	0.91

The correlation between MEGMX and FCEEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MEGMX vs. FCEEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEGMX

MEGMX Risk / Return Rank: 57
MEGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
MEGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
MEGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MEGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
MEGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

FCEEX

FCEEX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FCEEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FCEEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FCEEX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FCEEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FCEEX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEGMX vs. FCEEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MEGMX	FCEEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.75	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	2.26	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.33	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	2.92	-0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.22	10.07	-0.84

MEGMX vs. FCEEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEGMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the FCEEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEGMX and FCEEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MEGMX vs. FCEEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEGMX drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, which is greater than FCEEX's maximum drawdown of -34.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEGMX and FCEEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEGMX	FCEEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.64%	-34.68%	-2.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.34%	-12.98%	-2.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.39%	-15.47%	-2.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.89%	-31.37%	-3.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.04%	-7.05%	-2.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.41%	-11.14%	-3.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.51%	3.75%	+0.76%

Volatility

MEGMX vs. FCEEX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) has a higher volatility of 11.68% compared to Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) at 10.17%. This indicates that MEGMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCEEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEGMX	FCEEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.68%	10.17%	+1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.83%	19.55%	+3.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.55%	21.63%	+2.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.78%	17.80%	+0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.60%	18.86%	-0.26%

MEGMX vs. FCEEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEGMX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FCEEX's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

MEGMX vs. FCEEX - Dividend Comparison

MEGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than FCEEX's 2.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FCEEX Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	2.42%	3.29%	4.17%	4.36%	4.08%	3.38%	2.98%	0.40%
MEGMX Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund	2.38%	2.97%	0.92%	1.82%	1.81%	7.76%	2.26%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEGMX and FCEEX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, MEGMX and FCEEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MEGMX or FCEEX?

MEGMX has higher volatility (11.68%) compared to FCEEX (10.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEGMX dropped -37.64% vs FCEEX's -34.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCEEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.