PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCEEX vs. FEMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCEEX vs. FEMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) and Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund (FEMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCEEX achieves a 17.90% return, which is significantly lower than FEMVX's 24.29% return.


FCEEX

1D
4.25%
1M
-2.41%
6M
8.36%
YTD
17.90%
1Y
35.94%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.33%

FEMVX

1D
3.82%
1M
-2.06%
6M
13.63%
YTD
24.29%
1Y
44.69%
3Y*
23.98%
5Y*
12.63%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FCEEX vs. FEMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FCEEX
Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
17.90%34.81%10.51%12.52%-16.96%-1.29%30.55%
FEMVX
Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
24.29%33.95%11.68%17.43%-16.98%6.02%35.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FCEEX and FEMVX is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020

0.95

The correlation between FCEEX and FEMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCEEX vs. FEMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCEEX
FCEEX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FCEEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCEEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCEEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FCEEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCEEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FEMVX
FEMVX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FEMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCEEX vs. FEMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) and Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund (FEMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCEEXFEMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.37

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

3.30

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.86

10.28

-2.42

FCEEX vs. FEMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCEEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the FEMVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCEEX and FEMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCEEX vs. FEMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCEEX drawdown since its inception was -34.68%, which is greater than FEMVX's maximum drawdown of -30.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCEEX and FEMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCEEXFEMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.68%

-30.54%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.53%

-12.84%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.47%

-15.64%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.92%

-28.99%

-1.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.85%

-9.51%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.13%

-7.64%

-3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

4.11%

+0.14%

Volatility

FCEEX vs. FEMVX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) has a higher volatility of 9.78% compared to Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund (FEMVX) at 8.92%. This indicates that FCEEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCEEXFEMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.78%

8.92%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.57%

20.00%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.69%

21.74%

+0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.95%

16.82%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.99%

16.78%

+2.21%

FCEEX vs. FEMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCEEX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMVX's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FCEEX vs. FEMVX - Dividend Comparison

FCEEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than FEMVX's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FCEEX
Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
3.61%3.29%4.17%4.36%4.08%3.38%2.98%0.40%
FEMVX
Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
3.19%3.97%3.65%4.73%4.87%5.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FCEEX and FEMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCEEX has higher volatility (9.78%) compared to FEMVX (8.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCEEX dropped -34.68% vs FEMVX's -30.54%.

FEMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCEEX and FEMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer