PortfoliosLab logo
ASIA vs. ASEA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ASIA and ASEA is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ASIA vs. ASEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) and Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ASIA:

0.26

ASEA:

0.93

Sortino Ratio

ASIA:

0.39

ASEA:

1.27

Omega Ratio

ASIA:

1.05

ASEA:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

ASIA:

0.15

ASEA:

0.70

Martin Ratio

ASIA:

0.38

ASEA:

2.03

Ulcer Index

ASIA:

9.56%

ASEA:

7.70%

Daily Std Dev

ASIA:

21.85%

ASEA:

18.57%

Max Drawdown

ASIA:

-23.95%

ASEA:

-44.14%

Current Drawdown

ASIA:

-8.62%

ASEA:

-6.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASIA achieves a 4.83% return, which is significantly higher than ASEA's 4.29% return.


ASIA

YTD

4.83%

1M

5.27%

6M

2.22%

1Y

6.67%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ASEA

YTD

4.29%

1M

3.23%

6M

1.09%

1Y

17.18%

3Y*

6.72%

5Y*

10.27%

10Y*

3.99%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF

Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF

ASIA vs. ASEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASIA has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ASEA's 0.65% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ASIA vs. ASEA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASIA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ASIA is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ASIA is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ASIA is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ASIA is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ASIA is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ASIA is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

ASEA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ASEA is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ASEA is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ASEA is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ASEA is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ASEA is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ASEA is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ASIA vs. ASEA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) and Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ASIA Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the ASEA Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASIA and ASEA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ASIA vs. ASEA - Dividend Comparison

ASIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than ASEA's 3.46% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ASIA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
0.55%0.58%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ASEA
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF
3.46%3.61%3.76%2.23%4.18%2.27%2.51%3.08%1.59%2.78%3.64%2.65%

Drawdowns

ASIA vs. ASEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASIA drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, smaller than the maximum ASEA drawdown of -44.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIA and ASEA.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ASIA vs. ASEA - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) at 3.51%. This indicates that ASIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...