ASIA vs. VEU

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ASIA (Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF) and VEU (Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASIA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Matthews, while VEU is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World ex US Index. ASIA is actively managed, while VEU is passively managed. Over the past year, ASIA returned 70.76% vs 35.21% for VEU. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ASIA charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VEU.

Performance

ASIA vs. VEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASIA achieves a 38.62% return, which is significantly higher than VEU's 16.58% return.

ASIA

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 10.36%
• YTD: 38.62%
• 6M: 40.85%
• 1Y: 70.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VEU

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 3.87%
• YTD: 16.58%
• 6M: 17.12%
• 1Y: 35.21%
• 3Y*: 20.50%
• 5Y*: 9.48%
• 10Y*: 10.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASIA vs. VEU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ASIA Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF	38.62%	32.06%	3.41%	0.01%
VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF	16.58%	32.35%	5.56%	8.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ASIA and VEU is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023	0.80

The correlation between ASIA and VEU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

ASIA vs. VEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ASIA	VEU
Technology	55.9%	21.6%
Financial Services	14.6%	22.6%
Industrials	9.2%	15.0%
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	8.0%
Communication Services	3.9%	4.5%
Energy	3.0%	4.7%
Healthcare	2.9%	6.7%
Real Estate	2.5%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.4%	7.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	4.9%
Utilities	-	3.0%

Return for Risk

ASIA vs. VEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASIA

ASIA Risk / Return Rank: 87
ASIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
ASIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
ASIA Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ASIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
ASIA Martin Ratio Rank: 86

VEU

VEU Risk / Return Rank: 68
VEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
VEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VEU Omega Ratio Rank: 71
VEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
VEU Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASIA vs. VEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASIA	VEU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.92	2.19	+0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.48	2.98	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.40	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.91	3.10	+1.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.48	11.87	+5.61

ASIA vs. VEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASIA Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the VEU Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASIA and VEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ASIA vs. VEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASIA drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, smaller than the maximum VEU drawdown of -61.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIA and VEU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASIA	VEU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.95%	-61.52%	+37.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.47%	-11.43%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.69%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.84%	-13.10%	+8.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.06%	2.97%	+1.09%

Volatility

ASIA vs. VEU - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) has a higher volatility of 13.30% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) at 6.30%. This indicates that ASIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASIA	VEU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.30%	6.30%	+7.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.85%	14.12%	+7.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.41%	16.16%	+8.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.27%	16.24%	+5.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.27%	17.23%	+4.04%

ASIA vs. VEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASIA has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VEU's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASIA vs. VEU - Dividend Comparison

ASIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than VEU's 2.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASIA Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF	0.75%	1.05%	0.58%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF	2.48%	3.09%	3.24%	3.32%	3.12%	3.08%	2.00%	3.10%	3.27%	2.66%	2.96%	2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASIA and VEU in my portfolio?

ASIA and VEU have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASIA or VEU?

ASIA has higher volatility (13.30%) compared to VEU (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASIA dropped -23.95% vs VEU's -61.52%.

Which ETF is better, ASIA or VEU?

On 1-year performance, ASIA leads with 70.76% vs 35.21% for VEU. On fees, VEU is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VEU has been the lower-risk option at 6.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ASIA or VEU?

Over the 1-year period, ASIA has performed better with a 70.76% return vs 35.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASIA or VEU?

VEU is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ASIA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASIA or VEU?

VEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 0.75% for ASIA.

What is the main difference between ASIA and VEU?

ASIA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VEU is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Matthews and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ASIA and 0.04% for VEU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.