MEDP vs. SCJ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MEDP (Medpace Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while SCJ (iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF) is Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Small Cap Index. Over the past 5 years, MEDP returned 21.65%/yr vs 7.36%/yr for SCJ. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MEDP vs. SCJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) and iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEDP achieves a -19.73% return, which is significantly lower than SCJ's 14.35% return.

MEDP

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 8.10%
• YTD: -19.73%
• 6M: -21.80%
• 1Y: 47.29%
• 3Y*: 28.58%
• 5Y*: 21.65%
• 10Y*: —

SCJ

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 5.04%
• YTD: 14.35%
• 6M: 16.37%
• 1Y: 30.15%
• 3Y*: 17.70%
• 5Y*: 7.36%
• 10Y*: 7.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEDP vs. SCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MEDP Medpace Holdings, Inc.	-19.73%	69.05%	8.38%	44.31%	-2.40%	56.35%	65.60%	58.81%	45.97%	0.53%
SCJ iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF	14.35%	29.58%	3.41%	13.22%	-12.75%	-2.95%	7.46%	16.16%	-17.17%	31.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MEDP and SCJ is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2016	0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between MEDP and SCJ has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MEDP vs. SCJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEDP

MEDP Risk / Return Rank: 68
MEDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
MEDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MEDP Omega Ratio Rank: 78
MEDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
MEDP Martin Ratio Rank: 66

SCJ

SCJ Risk / Return Rank: 53
SCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
SCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
SCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEDP vs. SCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) and iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MEDP	SCJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.69	1.88	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	2.67	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.34	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	2.49	-1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.98	8.42	-5.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MEDP vs. SCJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEDP Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the SCJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEDP and SCJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MEDP	SCJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69	1.88	-1.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.47	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.30	+0.36

Drawdowns

MEDP vs. SCJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEDP drawdown since its inception was -42.87%, roughly equal to the maximum SCJ drawdown of -43.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDP and SCJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEDP	SCJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.87%	-43.52%	+0.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.61%	-12.17%	-24.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.38%	-12.43%	-26.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.87%	-33.25%	-9.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.36%	-1.82%	-25.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.89%	-10.38%	-2.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.92%	3.59%	+12.33%

Volatility

MEDP vs. SCJ - Volatility Comparison

Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) at 4.03%. This indicates that MEDP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEDP	SCJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.02%	4.03%	+2.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.13%	13.13%	+25.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.32%	16.11%	+53.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.61%	15.81%	+35.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.82%	16.29%	+33.53%

Dividends

MEDP vs. SCJ - Dividend Comparison

MEDP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MEDP Medpace Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCJ iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF	2.75%	3.14%	1.79%	1.99%	1.18%	1.87%	0.89%	1.85%	1.44%	1.45%	2.73%	1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEDP and SCJ in my portfolio?

MEDP and SCJ have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MEDP or SCJ?

MEDP has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to SCJ (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEDP dropped -42.87% vs SCJ's -43.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.