MDYV vs. XLU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MDYV (SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF) and XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MDYV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDYV returned 10.40%/yr vs 9.15%/yr for XLU. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MDYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLU.

Performance

MDYV vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDYV achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly higher than XLU's 3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, MDYV has outperformed XLU with an annualized return of 10.40%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.15% annualized return.

MDYV

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 9.04%
• 6M: 9.24%
• 1Y: 20.68%
• 3Y*: 13.90%
• 5Y*: 7.48%
• 10Y*: 10.40%

XLU

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -5.74%
• YTD: 3.11%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 9.11%
• 3Y*: 13.74%
• 5Y*: 9.25%
• 10Y*: 9.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDYV vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF	9.04%	7.45%	11.48%	15.35%	-7.19%	30.51%	3.68%	25.89%	-11.95%	12.31%
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF	3.11%	16.03%	23.31%	-7.18%	1.44%	17.70%	0.51%	25.93%	3.94%	12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between MDYV and XLU is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005	0.40

The correlation between MDYV and XLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MDYV vs. XLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MDYV	XLU
Financial Services	21.8%	-
Industrials	18.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	13.5%	-
Real Estate	9.6%	-
Technology	9.3%	-
Energy	7.4%	-
Basic Materials	6.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	-
Utilities	4.2%	100.0%
Healthcare	3.5%	-
Communication Services	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

MDYV vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDYV

MDYV Risk / Return Rank: 39
MDYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
MDYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
MDYV Omega Ratio Rank: 36
MDYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
MDYV Martin Ratio Rank: 42

XLU

XLU Risk / Return Rank: 19
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 18
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDYV vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MDYV	XLU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	0.63	+0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	0.94	+1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.12	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	1.00	+0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.78	2.24	+4.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MDYV vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDYV Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDYV and XLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MDYV	XLU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	0.63	+0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.54	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.48	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.40	+0.02

Drawdowns

MDYV vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDYV drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, which is greater than XLU's maximum drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYV and XLU.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDYV	XLU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.71%	-51.98%	-8.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.53%	-9.18%	-1.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.58%	-17.26%	-5.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.58%	-25.26%	+2.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.90%	-36.07%	-9.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-7.78%	+7.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.62%	-10.22%	+1.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	4.09%	-1.03%

Volatility

MDYV vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) is 3.93%, while State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that MDYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MDYV	XLU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	5.41%	-1.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.56%	11.53%	-0.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.25%	14.57%	+0.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.50%	17.32%	+2.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.90%	19.26%	+2.64%

MDYV vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MDYV vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

MDYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than XLU's 2.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF	1.73%	1.72%	1.89%	1.59%	1.90%	1.74%	1.69%	1.83%	2.28%	2.48%	1.83%	4.31%
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.72%	2.71%	2.96%	3.39%	2.92%	2.79%	3.14%	2.95%	3.33%	3.33%	3.41%	3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDYV and XLU in my portfolio?

MDYV and XLU have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MDYV or XLU?

XLU has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to MDYV (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYV dropped -60.71% vs XLU's -51.98%.

Which ETF is better, MDYV or XLU?

On 10-year performance, MDYV leads with 10.40% vs 9.15% for XLU. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, MDYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MDYV or XLU?

Over the 10-year period, MDYV has performed better with a 10.40% return vs 9.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MDYV or XLU?

XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDYV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MDYV or XLU?

XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.73% for MDYV.

What is the main difference between MDYV and XLU?

MDYV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while XLU is Utilities Equities. MDYV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYV and 0.08% for XLU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MDYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.