PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDYV vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDYV vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDYV achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MDYV having a 10.40% annualized return and XLE not far behind at 10.22%.


MDYV

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.78%
YTD
9.04%
6M
9.24%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*
10.40%

XLE

1D
1.29%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
32.17%
6M
29.80%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDYV vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
9.04%7.45%11.48%15.35%-7.19%30.51%3.68%25.89%-11.95%12.31%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
32.17%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MDYV and XLE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between MDYV and XLE has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MDYV vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDYV
XLE

Financial Services

21.8%

-

Industrials

18.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%

-

Real Estate

9.6%

-

Technology

9.3%

-

Energy

7.4%
100.0%

Basic Materials

6.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.5%

-

Utilities

4.2%

-

Healthcare

3.5%

-

Communication Services

0.5%

-

Financial Services

MDYV
21.8%
XLE

-

Industrials

MDYV
18.8%
XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

MDYV
13.5%
XLE

-

Real Estate

MDYV
9.6%
XLE

-

Technology

MDYV
9.3%
XLE

-

Energy

MDYV
7.4%
XLE
100.0%

Basic Materials

MDYV
6.0%
XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

MDYV
5.5%
XLE

-

Utilities

MDYV
4.2%
XLE

-

Healthcare

MDYV
3.5%
XLE

-

Communication Services

MDYV
0.5%
XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDYV vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDYV
MDYV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MDYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDYV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MDYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDYV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDYV vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDYVXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

3.75

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

10.92

-4.14

MDYV vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDYV Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDYV and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDYVXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.21

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.79

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.35

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.31

+0.10

Drawdowns

MDYV vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDYV drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYV and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDYVXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.71%

-71.26%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-12.05%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-20.14%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.58%

-26.04%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.90%

-66.81%

+20.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-6.15%

+5.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.62%

-17.98%

+9.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

4.14%

-1.08%

Volatility

MDYV vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) is 3.93%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that MDYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDYVXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

8.25%

-4.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.56%

16.58%

-6.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

20.53%

-5.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

26.02%

-6.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.90%

29.59%

-7.69%

MDYV vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MDYV vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

MDYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than XLE's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
1.73%1.72%1.89%1.59%1.90%1.74%1.69%1.83%2.28%2.48%1.83%4.31%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDYV and XLE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to MDYV (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYV dropped -60.71% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, MDYV leads with 10.40% vs 10.22% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, MDYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MDYV has performed better with a 10.40% return vs 10.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDYV.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.73% for MDYV.

MDYV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. MDYV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYV and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDYV and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer