PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDYV vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDYV vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDYV achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 10.98% return. Over the past 10 years, MDYV has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 10.40%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.62% annualized return.


MDYV

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.78%
YTD
9.04%
6M
9.24%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*
10.40%

SPYM

1D
-0.66%
1M
5.06%
YTD
10.98%
6M
10.98%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDYV vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
9.04%7.45%11.48%15.35%-7.19%30.51%3.68%25.89%-11.95%12.31%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
10.98%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between MDYV and SPYM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005

0.73

The correlation between MDYV and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MDYV vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDYV
SPYM

Financial Services

21.8%
11.1%

Industrials

18.8%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
9.9%

Real Estate

9.6%
1.8%

Technology

9.3%
38.5%

Energy

7.4%
3.2%

Basic Materials

6.0%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
4.6%

Utilities

4.2%
2.5%

Healthcare

3.5%
8.4%

Communication Services

0.5%
10.6%

Financial Services

MDYV
21.8%
SPYM
11.1%

Industrials

MDYV
18.8%
SPYM
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MDYV
13.5%
SPYM
9.9%

Real Estate

MDYV
9.6%
SPYM
1.8%

Technology

MDYV
9.3%
SPYM
38.5%

Energy

MDYV
7.4%
SPYM
3.2%

Basic Materials

MDYV
6.0%
SPYM
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

MDYV
5.5%
SPYM
4.6%

Utilities

MDYV
4.2%
SPYM
2.5%

Healthcare

MDYV
3.5%
SPYM
8.4%

Communication Services

MDYV
0.5%
SPYM
10.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDYV vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDYV
MDYV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MDYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDYV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MDYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDYV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDYV vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDYVSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.44

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

3.17

-1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

14.76

-7.97

MDYV vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDYV Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDYV and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDYVSPYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.39

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.83

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.87

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.62

-0.20

Drawdowns

MDYV vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDYV drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYV and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDYVSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.71%

-54.46%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-8.90%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-18.72%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.58%

-24.48%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.90%

-33.87%

-12.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.66%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.62%

-7.15%

-1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

1.91%

+1.15%

Volatility

MDYV vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 2.83%. This indicates that MDYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDYVSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

2.83%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.56%

8.90%

+1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

11.80%

+3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

16.80%

+2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.90%

18.00%

+3.90%

MDYV vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MDYV vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

MDYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than SPYM's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
1.73%1.72%1.89%1.59%1.90%1.74%1.69%1.83%2.28%2.48%1.83%4.31%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDYV and SPYM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDYV has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to SPYM (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYV dropped -60.71% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.62% vs 10.40% for MDYV. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.62% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDYV.

MDYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 1.00% for SPYM.

MDYV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. MDYV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYV and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDYV and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer