MDYV vs. RWK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MDYV (SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF) and RWK (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MDYV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while RWK is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDYV returned 10.40%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for RWK. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RWK.

Performance

MDYV vs. RWK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDYV achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly lower than RWK's 13.47% return. Over the past 10 years, MDYV has underperformed RWK with an annualized return of 10.40%, while RWK has yielded a comparatively higher 12.80% annualized return.

MDYV

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 9.04%
• 6M: 9.24%
• 1Y: 20.68%
• 3Y*: 13.90%
• 5Y*: 7.48%
• 10Y*: 10.40%

RWK

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 4.38%
• YTD: 13.47%
• 6M: 12.75%
• 1Y: 28.13%
• 3Y*: 18.05%
• 5Y*: 10.64%
• 10Y*: 12.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDYV vs. RWK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF	9.04%	7.45%	11.48%	15.35%	-7.19%	30.51%	3.68%	25.89%	-11.95%	12.31%
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF	13.47%	10.27%	11.94%	23.76%	-8.19%	34.31%	11.06%	28.20%	-14.65%	13.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MDYV and RWK is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2008	0.89

The correlation between MDYV and RWK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

MDYV vs. RWK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MDYV	RWK
Financial Services	21.8%	13.1%
Industrials	18.8%	21.8%
Consumer Cyclical	13.5%	20.7%
Real Estate	9.6%	2.8%
Technology	9.3%	14.0%
Energy	7.4%	5.3%
Basic Materials	6.0%	4.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	11.3%
Utilities	4.2%	1.6%
Healthcare	3.5%	4.0%
Communication Services	0.5%	0.7%

Return for Risk

MDYV vs. RWK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDYV

MDYV Risk / Return Rank: 39
MDYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
MDYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
MDYV Omega Ratio Rank: 36
MDYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
MDYV Martin Ratio Rank: 42

RWK

RWK Risk / Return Rank: 49
RWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
RWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
RWK Omega Ratio Rank: 46
RWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
RWK Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDYV vs. RWK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MDYV	RWK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.70	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	2.54	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.29	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	2.54	-0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.78	8.15	-1.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MDYV vs. RWK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDYV Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the RWK Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDYV and RWK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MDYV	RWK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	1.70	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.51	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.56	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.48	-0.06

Drawdowns

MDYV vs. RWK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDYV drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, which is greater than RWK's maximum drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYV and RWK.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDYV	RWK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.71%	-56.49%	-4.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.53%	-11.14%	+0.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.58%	-24.58%	+2.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.58%	-24.58%	+2.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.90%	-46.20%	+0.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-0.23%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.62%	-7.55%	-1.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	3.46%	-0.40%

Volatility

MDYV vs. RWK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) is 3.93%, while Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) has a volatility of 4.70%. This indicates that MDYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MDYV	RWK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	4.70%	-0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.56%	11.86%	-1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.25%	16.70%	-1.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.50%	21.13%	-1.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.90%	22.95%	-1.05%

MDYV vs. RWK - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RWK's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

MDYV vs. RWK - Dividend Comparison

MDYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than RWK's 1.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF	1.73%	1.72%	1.89%	1.59%	1.90%	1.74%	1.69%	1.83%	2.28%	2.48%	1.83%	4.31%
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF	1.12%	1.25%	1.11%	1.05%	1.18%	0.85%	0.96%	1.09%	1.22%	0.99%	1.30%	0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDYV and RWK in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, MDYV and RWK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MDYV or RWK?

RWK has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to MDYV (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYV dropped -60.71% vs RWK's -56.49%.

Which ETF is better, MDYV or RWK?

On 10-year performance, RWK leads with 12.80% vs 10.40% for MDYV. On fees, MDYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MDYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MDYV or RWK?

Over the 10-year period, RWK has performed better with a 12.80% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MDYV or RWK?

MDYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MDYV or RWK?

MDYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 1.12% for RWK.

What is the main difference between MDYV and RWK?

MDYV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while RWK is Small Cap Blend Equities. MDYV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while RWK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYV and 0.39% for RWK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.